Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838356›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2016

Age-related effects of increasing postural challenge on eye movement onset latencies to visual targets.

Sergio Jimenez, Mark Hollands, Stephen Palmisano, Juno Kim, Maria Markoulli, Darryl McAndrew, Alexander Stamenkovic, Joel Walsh, Sophie Bos, Paul J Stapley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sergio JimenezNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Mark HollandsSchool of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen PalmisanoSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Juno KimFaculty of Science, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Maria MarkoulliFaculty of Science, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Darryl McAndrewNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Alexander StamenkovicNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Joel WalshNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Sophie BosNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Paul J StapleyNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia. pstapley@uow.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a single light cue is given in the visual field, our eyes orient towards it with an average latency of 200 ms. If a second cue is presented at or around the time of the response to the first, a secondary eye movement occurs that represents a reorientation to the new target. While studies have shown that eye movement latencies to 'single-step' targets may or may not be lengthened with age, secondary eye movements (during 'double-step' displacements) are significantly delayed with increasing age. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the postural challenge posed simply by standing (as opposed to sitting) results in significantly longer eye movement latencies in older adults compared to the young. Ten young (<35 years) and 10 older healthy adults (>65 years) participated in the study. They were required to fixate upon a central target and move their eyes in response to 2 types of stimuli: (1) a single-step perturbation of target position either 15° to the right or left and (2) a double-step target displacement incorporating an initial target jump to the right or left by 15°, followed after 200 ms, by a shift of target position to the opposite side (e.g. +15° then -15°). All target displacement conditions were executed in sit and stand positions with the participant at the same distance from the targets. Eye movements were recorded using electro-oculography. Older adults did not show significantly longer eye movement latencies than the younger adults for single-step target displacements, and postural configuration (stand compared to sit) had no effect upon latencies for either group. We categorised double-step trials into those during which the second light changed after or before the onset of the eye shift to the first light. For the former category, young participants showed faster secondary eye shifts to the second light in the standing position, while the older adults did not. For the latter category of double-step trial, young participants showed no significant difference between sit and stand secondary eye movement latencies, but older adults were significantly longer standing compared to sitting. The older adults were significantly longer than the younger adults across both postural conditions, regardless of when the second light change occurred during the eye shift to the first light. We suggest that older adults require greater time and perhaps attentional processes to execute eye movements to unexpected changes in target position when faced with the need to maintain standing balance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAgingElectrooculographyEye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansPostureReaction TimeYoung AdultAgeingBalanceElectro-oculographyGazeTarget perturbations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.