Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838293›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016

Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe.

D Kokotovic, H Sjølander, I Gögenur, F Helgstrand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ventral hernia recurrence in women of childbearing age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mapping the therapeutic landscape in emergency incisional hernia: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Significant increase of emergency hernia operation during COVID.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D KokotovicDepartment of Surgery, Køge Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark. dunja.kokotovic@hotmail.com.
H SjølanderDepartment of Surgery, Køge Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
I GögenurDepartment of Surgery, Køge Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
F HelgstrandDepartment of Surgery, Køge Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to risks of postoperative morbidity and recurrence some patients with a ventral hernia are not offered surgical repair. There is limited data on the rate and consequences of a watchful waiting (WW) strategy for these patients. The objective of this cohort study was to analyse outcomes for patients with a ventral hernia who underwent watchful waiting, in terms of later requirement for hernia repair.

methodsAll patients (≥18 years) electively referred to our out-patient clinic from 1 January 2009 to 1 July 2014 with incisional, umbilical or epigastric hernia were included. Information on patient characteristics and whether patients underwent WW or surgery was obtained from hospital files and the Danish National Patient Register. A 100% follow-up was obtained.

resultsThe analyses comprised 569 patients with incisional hernia (WW = 58.1%) and 789 patients with umbilical/epigastric hernia (WW = 43.2%). Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated that the probability for patients who underwent watchful waiting to receive later surgical repair was 19 for incisional hernias and 16% for umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. The probability of requiring emergency repair when in the WW group was 4% for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. There were no significant differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation or mortality rates between the WW patients who later underwent elective hernia repair and patients who were initially offered surgery (p > 0.05), for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias.

conclusionsWatchful waiting appears to be a safe strategy in the treatment of incisional, umbilical and epigastric hernias.

Indexed as

Watchful WaitingAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHernia, VentralHumansIncisional HerniaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWound HealingIncisional herniaUmbilical herniaVentral herniaWatchful waiting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.