Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838039›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Arsenic contamination of groundwater and its induced health effects in Shahpur block, Bhojpur district, Bihar state, India: risk evaluation.

Dipankar Chakraborti, Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman, Sad Ahamed, Rathindra Nath Dutta, Shyamapada Pati, Subhash Chandra Mukherjee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Protective efficacy ofToxicological research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in the Ganga River Basin: A Future Health Danger.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dipankar ChakrabortiSchool of Environmental Studies (SOES), Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700 032, India. dcsoesju@gmail.com.
Mohammad Mahmudur RahmanGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Sad AhamedSchool of Environmental Studies (SOES), Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700 032, India.
Rathindra Nath DuttaDepartment of Dermatology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Shyamapada PatiKolkata National Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Subhash Chandra MukherjeeDepartment of Neurology, Medical College, Kolkata, India.
Jadavpur University · INCalcutta National Medical College and Hospital · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INKPC Medical College and Hospital · INUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the magnitude of groundwater arsenic contamination in Shahpur block of Bhojpur district, Bihar state, India and its health effects such as dermal, neurological, obstetric effects, and cancer risk. The School of Environmental Studies (SOES) collected 4704 tube-well water samples from all 88 villages of Shahpur, which were analyzed for arsenic. We found 40.3 and 21.1 % of the tube-wells had arsenic above 10 and 50 μg/l, respectively, with maximum concentration of 1805 μg/l. The study shows that 75,000, 39,000, and 10,000 people could be exposed to arsenic-contaminated water greater than 10, 50, and 300 μg/l, respectively. Our medical team examined 1422 villagers from Shahpur and registered 161 (prevalence rate, 11.3 %) with arsenical skin lesions. Arsenical skin lesions were also observed in 29 children of 525 screened. We analyzed 579 biological samples (hair, nail, and urine) from Shahpur and found that 82, 89, and 91 % of hair, nail, and urine, respectively, had arsenic above the normal levels, indicating many people in the study area are sub-clinically affected. Arsenical neuropathy was observed in 48 % of 102 arsenicosis patients. The study also found that arsenic exposed women with severe skin lesions had adversely affected their pregnancies. The carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks were also estimated based on the generated data. Safe drinking water supply is urgently required to combat arsenic situation in affected villages of Shahpur.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedArsenicArsenic PoisoningChildFemaleGroundwaterHairHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNailsPregnancyRisk AssessmentArsenicWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicArsenical neuropathyArsenical skin lesionsBiological samplesCarcinogenic riskGroundwaterPregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID26838039
OpenAlexW2301090045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.