Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26837817›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2016

A cluster-randomised controlled trial of values-based training to promote autonomously held recovery values in mental health workers.

Virginia Williams, Frank P Deane, Lindsay G Oades, Trevor P Crowe, Joseph Ciarrochi, Retta Andresen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Recovery-oriented mental health training interventions: An integrative review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Virginia WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. vcw961@uow.edu.au.
Frank P DeaneIllawarra Institute for Mental Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. fdeane@uow.edu.au.
Lindsay G OadesAustralian Institute of Business Wellbeing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. loades@uow.edu.au.
Trevor P CroweSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. tcrowe@uow.edu.au.
Joseph CiarrochiInstitute of Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia. jciarrochi@gmail.com.
Retta AndresenIllawarra Institute for Mental Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. retta@uow.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation and use of evidence-based practices is a key priority for recovery-oriented mental health service provision. Training and development programmes for employees continue to be a key method of knowledge and skill development, despite acknowledged difficulties with uptake and maintenance of behaviour change. Self-determination theory suggests that autonomy, or a sense that behaviour is self-generated, is a key motivator to sustained behaviour change, in this case practices in mental health services. This study examined the utility of values-focused staff intervention as a specific, reproducible method of autonomy support.

methodsMental health workers (n = 146) were assigned via cluster randomisation to either a values clarification condition or an active problem-solving control condition.

resultsResults demonstrated that a structured values clarification exercise was useful in promoting integrated motivation for the changed practice and resulted in increased implementation planning.

conclusionsStructured values clarification intervention demonstrates utility as a reproducible means of autonomy support within the workplace. We discuss future directions for the study of autonomous motivation in the field of implementation science.

trial registrationACTRN12613000353796.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingSocial ValuesAdolescentAdultAustraliaClinical CompetenceEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedProfessional AutonomyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26837817
PMCPMC4738767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.