Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26837755›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

SapTrap, a Toolkit for High-Throughput CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Modification in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Matthew L Schwartz, Erik M Jorgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Modular gene tagging inResearch square · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. TAG-IN, a swappable strategy for endogenous gene tagging inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Modular gene tagging inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MLT-11 is necessary forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Transposon Regulation in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. AnalysisbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew L SchwartzDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0840 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0840.
Erik M JorgensenDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0840 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0840 jorgensen@biology.utah.edu.

Funding

Engineering the C. Elegans GenomeR01GM095817 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JORGENSEN, ERIK M · 2011 to 2021
$2.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 2R01GM095817NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In principle, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 allows genetic tags to be inserted at any locus. However, throughput is limited by the laborious construction of repair templates and guide RNA constructs and by the identification of modified strains. We have developed a reagent toolkit and plasmid assembly pipeline, called "SapTrap," that streamlines the production of targeting vectors for tag insertion, as well as the selection of modified Caenorhabditis elegans strains. SapTrap is a high-efficiency modular plasmid assembly pipeline that produces single plasmid targeting vectors, each of which encodes both a guide RNA transcript and a repair template for a particular tagging event. The plasmid is generated in a single tube by cutting modular components with the restriction enzyme SapI, which are then "trapped" in a fixed order by ligation to generate the targeting vector. A library of donor plasmids supplies a variety of protein tags, a selectable marker, and regulatory sequences that allow cell-specific tagging at either the N or the C termini. All site-specific sequences, such as guide RNA targeting sequences and homology arms, are supplied as annealed synthetic oligonucleotides, eliminating the need for PCR or molecular cloning during plasmid assembly. Each tag includes an embedded Cbr-unc-119 selectable marker that is positioned to allow concurrent expression of both the tag and the marker. We demonstrate that SapTrap targeting vectors direct insertion of 3- to 4-kb tags at six different loci in 10-37% of injected animals. Thus SapTrap vectors introduce the possibility for high-throughput generation of CRISPR/Cas9 genome modifications.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene TargetingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCloning, MolecularGenetic EngineeringGenetic MarkersGenetic VectorsHomologous RecombinationOrgan SpecificityRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic MarkersRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR/Cas9gene tagginghigh-throughputplasmid toolkit

Identifiers

PMID26837755
PMCPMC4905529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.