ReviewSaudi medical journal2016
Doctor-patient relationship. Islamic perspective.
Review in Saudi medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Professional Boundaries and Ethical Obligations in Saudi Arabia An Integrated Sharia, Legal and Clinical Psychology Framework.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Hierarchy hurts: a comparative cross-sectional analysis of empathy and its determinants in medical, midwifery, and nursing students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Islamic Jurisprudence, Biomedical Ethics, and the Social Construct in Relation to Intersex People: A Scoping Review.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Conceptualization of trust within medieval Islamic medicine.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2025Article
- Delays in Cardiovascular Emergency Responses in Africa: Health System Failures or Cultural Challenges?Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
- Risk management and empirical study of the doctor-patient relationship: based on 1790 litigation cases of medical damage liability disputes in China.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Perioperative use of immersive head-mounted virtual reality display enhances patient satisfaction in great saphenous vein surgery: a single-center clinical observation study.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Physicians' professionalism from the patients' perspective: a qualitative study at a single-family practice in Saudi Arabia.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.PloS one · 2022Article
- A study protocol for a feasibility trial of telephone-delivered Adherence Therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes.Nursing open · 2021Article
- The Pivotal Role of Effective Communication in Patient Care: A Case of Coronary Stent Thrombosis.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- Informed Consent in Societies with Different Ethos of 'Selfhood'.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The doctor-patient relationship is an intricate concept in which patients voluntarily approach a doctor and become part of a contract by which they tend to abide by doctor's instructions. Over recent decades, this relationship has changed dramatically due to privatization and commercialization of the health sector. A review of the relevant literature in the database of MEDLINE published in English between 1966 and August 2015 was performed with the following keywords: doctor-patient relationship, physician-patient relationship, ethics, and Islam. The Muslim doctor should be familiar with the Islamic teachings on the daily issues faced in his/her practice and the relationship with his/her patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.