ReviewSkeletal radiology2016
An illustrative review to understand and manage metal-induced artifacts in musculoskeletal MRI: a primer and updates.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing knee MRI near orthopedic hardware using a 3D-printed anatomical phantom.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Combined MRI features to assess periprosthetic hip joint infection with STIR SEMAC and MAVRIC at 1.5 T.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Acceleration of slice encoding for metal artifact correction at 0.55 T using hexagonal sampling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Customized Additive Manufacturing in Bone Scaffolds-The Gateway to Precise Bone Defect Treatment.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Review
- The Utility of Isotropic 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Painful Total Ankle Replacements.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2022Review
- Clinical and Radiological Safety of Retained Implantable Doppler Devices Used for Free Flap Monitoring.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2022Article
- New 3-dimensional implant application as an alternative to allograft in limb salvage surgery: a technical note on 10 cases.Acta orthopaedica · 2020Article
- [Metallic Artifacts on MR Imaging and Methods for Their Reduction].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2020Review
- MRI basics for radiation oncologists.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2019Review
- [Magnetic resonance imaging findings after shoulder surgery: What the radiologist needs to know].Der Radiologe · 2017Review
- Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2017Article
- Resection and Resolution of Bone Marrow Lesions Associated with an Improvement of Pain after Total Knee Replacement: A Novel Case Study Using a 3-Tesla Metal Artefact Reduction MRI Sequence.Case reports in orthopedics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews and explains the basic physical principles of metal-induced MRI artifacts, describes simple ways to reduce them, and presents specific reduction solutions. Artifacts include signal loss, pile-up artifacts, geometric distortion, and failure of fat suppression. Their nature and origins are reviewed and explained though schematic representations that ease the understanding. Then, optimization of simple acquisition parameters is detailed. Lastly, dedicated sequences and options specifically developed to reduce metal artifacts (VAT, SEMAC, and MAVRIC) are explained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26837388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.