Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26836622›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2016

Aberrant network connectivity during error processing in patients with schizophrenia.

Rolf Voegler, Michael P I Becker, Alexander Nitsch, Wolfgang H R Miltner, Thomas Straube

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. EEG microstate co-specificity in schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Activation of Internal Correctness Monitoring Circuitry in Youths With Psychosis Spectrum Symptoms.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rolf VoeglerFrom the Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (Voegler, Becker, Straube); and the Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany (Nitsch, Miltner).
Michael P I BeckerFrom the Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (Voegler, Becker, Straube); and the Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany (Nitsch, Miltner).
Alexander NitschFrom the Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (Voegler, Becker, Straube); and the Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany (Nitsch, Miltner).
Wolfgang H R MiltnerFrom the Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (Voegler, Becker, Straube); and the Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany (Nitsch, Miltner).
Thomas StraubeFrom the Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (Voegler, Becker, Straube); and the Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany (Nitsch, Miltner).
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEAugenstern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroimaging methods have pointed to deficits in the interaction of large-scale brain networks in patients with schizophrenia. Abnormal connectivity of the right anterior insula (AI), a central hub of the salience network, is frequently reported and may underlie patients' deficits in adaptive salience processing and cognitive control. While most previous studies used resting state approaches, we examined right AI interactions in a task-based fMRI study.

methodsPatients with schizophrenia and healthy controls performed an adaptive version of the Eriksen Flanker task that was specifically designed to ensure a comparable number of errors between groups.

resultsWe included 27 patients with schizophrenia and 27 healthy controls in our study. The between-groups comparison replicated the classic finding of reduced activation in the midcingulate cortex (MCC) in patients with schizophrenia during the commission of errors while controlling for confounding factors, such as task performance and error frequency, which have been neglected in many previous studies. Subsequent psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed aberrant functional connectivity (FC) between the right AI and regions in the inferior frontal gyrus and temporoparietal junction. Additionally, FC between the MCC and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was reduced. LIMITATIONS: As we examined a sample of medicated patients, effects of antipsychotic medication may have influenced our results.

conclusionOverall, it appears that schizophrenia is associated with impairment of networks associated with detection of errors, refocusing of attention, superordinate guiding of cognitive control and their respective coordination.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAntipsychotic AgentsAttentionBrainBrain MappingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReaction TimeSchizophreniaAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26836622
PMCPMC4764490
OpenAlexW2270526286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.