Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26836490›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Many Dimensions of Diet Breadth: Phytochemical, Genetic, Behavioral, and Physiological Perspectives on the Interaction between a Native Herbivore and an Exotic Host.

Joshua G Harrison, Zachariah Gompert, James A Fordyce, C Alex Buerkle, Rachel Grinstead, Joshua P Jahner, Scott Mikel, Christopher C Nice, Aldrin Santamaria, Matthew L Forister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Additive genetic effects in interacting species jointly determine the outcome of caterpillar herbivory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joshua G HarrisonProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, United States of America.
Zachariah GompertDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322, United States of America.
James A FordyceDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, United States of America.
C Alex BuerkleDepartment of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071, United States of America.
Rachel GrinsteadDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, United States of America.
Joshua P JahnerDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, United States of America.
Scott MikelDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, United States of America.
Christopher C NiceDepartment of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, 78666, United States of America.
Aldrin SantamariaDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, United States of America.
Matthew L ForisterProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the perspective of an herbivorous insect, conspecific host plants are not identical, and intraspecific variation in host nutritional quality or defensive capacity might mediate spatially variable outcomes in plant-insect interactions. Here we explore this possibility in the context of an ongoing host breadth expansion of a native butterfly (the Melissa blue, Lycaeides melissa) onto an exotic host plant (alfalfa, Medicago sativa). We examine variation among seven alfalfa populations that differed in terms of colonization by L. melissa; specifically, we examined variation in phytochemistry, foliar protein, and plant population genetic structure, as well as responses of caterpillars and adult butterflies to foliage from the same populations. Regional patterns of alfalfa colonization by L. melissa were well predicted by phytochemical variation, and colonized patches of alfalfa showed a similar level of inter-individual phytochemical diversity. However, phytochemical variation was a poor predictor of larval performance, despite the fact that survival and weight gain differed dramatically among caterpillars reared on plants from different alfalfa populations. Moreover, we observed a mismatch between alfalfa supporting the best larval performance and alfalfa favored by ovipositing females. Thus, the axes of plant variation that mediate interactions with L. melissa depend upon herbivore life history stage, which raises important issues for our understanding of adaptation to novel resources by an organism with a complex life history.

Indexed as

HerbivoryPlantsAnimalsButterfliesCaliforniaLarvaNevadaOvipositionPhytochemicalsPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID26836490
PMCPMC4737494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.