Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26836351›Full record

Trial reportPrehospital emergency care

Comparison of Errors Using Two Length-Based Tape Systems for Prehospital Care in Children.

Lara D Rappaport, Lina Brou, Tim Givens, Maria Mandt, Ashley Balakas, Kelley Roswell, Jason Kotas, Kathleen M Adelgais

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prehospital emergency care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07504211 (Augmenting the On-Scene Medic), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07504211 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Augmenting the On-Scene Medic (ATOM): A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Software on Prehospital Pediatric Medication Administration Accuracy

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern Michigan University School of MedicineRan2023 to 2026Enrolled312ConditionsMedication Errors, Pediatric Medication ErrorArmsAugmented reality software for pediatric drug dosing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lara D Rappaport
Lina Brou
Tim Givens
Maria Mandt
Ashley Balakas
Kelley Roswell
Jason Kotas
Kathleen M Adelgais

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of a length/weight-based tape (LBT) for equipment size and drug dosing for pediatric patients is recommended in a joint statement by multiple national organizations. A new system, known as Handtevy™, allows for rapid determination of critical drug doses without performing calculations.

objectiveTo compare two LBT systems for dosing errors and time to medication administration in simulated prehospital scenarios.

methodsThis was a prospective randomized trial comparing the Broselow Pediatric Emergency Tape™ (Broselow) and Handtevy LBT™ (Handtevy). Paramedics performed 2 pediatric simulations: cardiac arrest with epinephrine administration and hypoglycemia mandating dextrose. Each scenario was repeated utilizing both systems with a 1-year-old and 5-year-old size manikin. Facilitators recorded identified errors and time points of critical actions including time to medication.

resultsWe enrolled 80 paramedics, performing 320 simulations. For Dextrose, there were significantly more errors with Broselow (63.8%) compared to Handtevy (13.8%) and time to administration was longer with the Broselow system (220 seconds vs. 173 seconds). For epinephrine, the LBTs were similar in overall error rate (Broselow 21.3% vs. Handtevy 16.3%) and time to administration (89 vs. 91 seconds). Cognitive errors were more frequent when using the Broselow compared to Handtevy, particularly with dextrose administration. The frequency of procedural errors was similar between the two LBT systems.

conclusionIn simulated prehospital scenarios, use of the Handtevy LBT system resulted in fewer errors for dextrose administration compared to the Broselow LBT, with similar time to administration and accuracy of epinephrine administration.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesGrowth ChartsBody Weights and MeasuresFemaleHumansMaleManikinsMedication ErrorsProspective Studiesemergency medical servicesmedication errorspediatrics

Identifiers

PMID26836351
PMCPMC6292711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.