Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26835782›Full record

ArticlePain2016

Preliminary validation of the Michigan Body Map.

Chad M Brummett, Rishi R Bakshi, Jenna Goesling, Daniel Leung, Stephanie E Moser, Jennifer W Zollars, David A Williams, Daniel J Clauw, Afton L Hassett

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04275297 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Psychosocial Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2020 to 2023Enrolled78ConditionsChronic Interstitial Cystitis, Bladder Pain Syndrome, Cystitis, Interstitial, Painful Bladder SyndromeArmsPsychosocial Treatment, Attention Control
NCT05986513 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Investigating Brain Abnormalities in People With Knee Osteoarthritis Using MRI: a Nociplastic Pain Mechanism Based Assessment

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Rehabilitation InstituteRan2023 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsChronic Pain, Central Sensitisation, Knee OsteoarthritisArmsCold Pressor Gel Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predicting pain location from resting-state brain fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chad M BrummettDepartments of Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, MI, USA.
Rishi R Bakshi
Jenna Goesling
Daniel Leung
Stephanie E Moser
Jennifer W Zollars
David A Williams
Daniel J Clauw
Afton L Hassett

Funding

Central Nervous System Mechanisms in Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA)R01AR060392 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRUMMETT, CHAD M, CLAUW, DANIEL J · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed the Michigan Body Map (MBM) as a self-report measure to assess body areas where chronic pain is experienced and to specifically quantify the degree of widespread body pain when assessing for centralized pain features (eg, fibromyalgia-like presentation). A total of 402 patients completed the measure in 5 distinct studies to support the validation of the original and a revised version of the MBM. Administration is rapid 39 to 44 seconds, and errors for the original MBM were detected in only 7.2% of the possible body areas. Most errors underestimated the number of painful areas or represented confusion in determining the right vs left side. The MBM was preferred (P = 0.013) and felt to better depict pain location (P = 0.001) when compared with the Widespread Pain Index checklist of the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey Criteria, but participants did not express any preference between the MBM and Brief Pain Inventory body map. Based on the data from the first 3 studies, a revised version of the MBM was created including a front and back body image and improved guidance on right-sidedness vs left. The revised MBM was preferred when compared with the original and was more accurate in depicting painful body areas (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the revised MBM showed convergent and discriminant validity with other self-report measures of pain, mood, and function. In conclusion, the MBM demonstrated utility, reliability, and construct validity. This new measure can be used to accurately assess the distribution of pain or widespread bodily pain as an element of the fibromyalgia survey score.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChecklistChronic PainFemaleFibromyalgiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID26835782
PMCPMC4868633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.