ArticleACS synthetic biology2016
A Statistical Approach Reveals Designs for the Most Robust Stochastic Gene Oscillators.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- A model-based design strategy to engineer miRNA-regulated detection systems.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Article
- A topological mechanism for robust and efficient global oscillations in biological networks.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Automated Design of Synthetic Gene Circuits in the Presence of Molecular Noise.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- Bayesian Optimization for Design of Multiscale Biological Circuits.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- The ups and downs of biological oscillators: a comparison of time-delayed negative feedback mechanisms.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Degradation-driven protein level oscillation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Bio Systems · 2022Article
- Single strain control of microbial consortia.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Automated design of synthetic microbial communities.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Robustness of a biomolecular oscillator to pulse perturbations.IET systems biology · 2020Article
- Quorum sensing for population-level control of bacteria and potential therapeutic applications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- From Microbial Communities to Distributed Computing Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Novel Tunable Spatio-Temporal Patterns From a Simple Genetic Oscillator Circuit.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Article
- A Bayesian framework for the analysis of systems biology models of the brain.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Parameter estimation in models of biological oscillators: an automated regularised estimation approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A Combinatorial Solution to Point Symbol Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Towards an Aspect-Oriented Design and Modelling Framework for Synthetic Biology.Processes (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Combining a Toggle Switch and a Repressilator within the AC-DC Circuit Generates Distinct Dynamical Behaviors.Cell systems · 2018Article
- Systems and synthetic biology approaches in understanding biological oscillators.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2018Article
- Computing with biological switches and clocks.Natural computing · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The engineering of transcriptional networks presents many challenges due to the inherent uncertainty in the system structure, changing cellular context, and stochasticity in the governing dynamics. One approach to address these problems is to design and build systems that can function across a range of conditions; that is they are robust to uncertainty in their constituent components. Here we examine the parametric robustness landscape of transcriptional oscillators, which underlie many important processes such as circadian rhythms and the cell cycle, plus also serve as a model for the engineering of complex and emergent phenomena. The central questions that we address are: Can we build genetic oscillators that are more robust than those already constructed? Can we make genetic oscillators arbitrarily robust? These questions are technically challenging due to the large model and parameter spaces that must be efficiently explored. Here we use a measure of robustness that coincides with the Bayesian model evidence, combined with an efficient Monte Carlo method to traverse model space and concentrate on regions of high robustness, which enables the accurate evaluation of the relative robustness of gene network models governed by stochastic dynamics. We report the most robust two and three gene oscillator systems, plus examine how the number of interactions, the presence of autoregulation, and degradation of mRNA and protein affects the frequency, amplitude, and robustness of transcriptional oscillators. We also find that there is a limit to parametric robustness, beyond which there is nothing to be gained by adding additional feedback. Importantly, we provide predictions on new oscillator systems that can be constructed to verify the theory and advance design and modeling approaches to systems and synthetic biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.