Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26835539›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2016

A Statistical Approach Reveals Designs for the Most Robust Stochastic Gene Oscillators.

Mae L Woods, Miriam Leon, Ruben Perez-Carrasco, Chris P Barnes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. From Microbial Communities to Distributed Computing Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Combinatorial Solution to Point Symbol Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mae L WoodsDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, ‡Department of Mathematics, and ¶Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London , London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Miriam LeonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, ‡Department of Mathematics, and ¶Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London , London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Ruben Perez-CarrascoDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, ‡Department of Mathematics, and ¶Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London , London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Chris P BarnesDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, ‡Department of Mathematics, and ¶Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London , London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
University College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097319Wellcome Trust 097319/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 098325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The engineering of transcriptional networks presents many challenges due to the inherent uncertainty in the system structure, changing cellular context, and stochasticity in the governing dynamics. One approach to address these problems is to design and build systems that can function across a range of conditions; that is they are robust to uncertainty in their constituent components. Here we examine the parametric robustness landscape of transcriptional oscillators, which underlie many important processes such as circadian rhythms and the cell cycle, plus also serve as a model for the engineering of complex and emergent phenomena. The central questions that we address are: Can we build genetic oscillators that are more robust than those already constructed? Can we make genetic oscillators arbitrarily robust? These questions are technically challenging due to the large model and parameter spaces that must be efficiently explored. Here we use a measure of robustness that coincides with the Bayesian model evidence, combined with an efficient Monte Carlo method to traverse model space and concentrate on regions of high robustness, which enables the accurate evaluation of the relative robustness of gene network models governed by stochastic dynamics. We report the most robust two and three gene oscillator systems, plus examine how the number of interactions, the presence of autoregulation, and degradation of mRNA and protein affects the frequency, amplitude, and robustness of transcriptional oscillators. We also find that there is a limit to parametric robustness, beyond which there is nothing to be gained by adding additional feedback. Importantly, we provide predictions on new oscillator systems that can be constructed to verify the theory and advance design and modeling approaches to systems and synthetic biology.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCell CycleCircadian RhythmComputer SimulationGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic EngineeringModels, GeneticMonte Carlo MethodProteinsResearch DesignRNA, MessengerStochastic ProcessesSynthetic BiologyProteinsRNA, Messengercircuit topologyoscillationsrobustnesssequential Monte Carlostochastic processes

Identifiers

PMID26835539
PMCPMC4914944
OpenAlexW2950452652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.