Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26835509›Full record

SynthesiseNeuro

Gray Matter Features of Reading Disability: A Combined Meta-Analytic and Direct Analysis Approach(1,2,3,4).

Mark A Eckert, Virginia W Berninger, Kenneth I Vaden, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Loretta Tsu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neuroanatomical differences in early bilingual and monolingual children.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dyslexia Data Consortium Repository: A Data Sharing and Delivery Platform for Research.Brain informatics : 16th International Conference, BI 2023, Hoboken, NJ, USA, August 1-3, 2023, Proceedings. International Conference on Brain Informatics (16th : 2023 : Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark A EckertDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina 29425.
Virginia W BerningerDepartment of Education, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington 98195.
Kenneth I VadenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina 29425.ORCID 0000-0002-3621-2043
Mulugeta GebregziabherDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina 29425.
Loretta TsuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina 29425.

Funding

Multi-site Study of DyslexiaR01HD069374 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Mark Andrew Eckert · 2012 to 2026
$4.3M
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR14516NICHD NIH HHS 5R01HD069374NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry dyslexia studies and direct analysis of 293 reading disability and control cases from six different research sites were performed to characterize defining gray matter features of reading disability. These analyses demonstrated consistently lower gray matter volume in left posterior superior temporal sulcus/middle temporal gyrus regions and left orbitofrontal gyrus/pars orbitalis regions. Gray matter volume within both of these regions significantly predicted individual variation in reading comprehension after correcting for multiple comparisons. These regional gray matter differences were observed across published studies and in the multisite dataset after controlling for potential age and gender effects, and despite increased anatomical variance in the reading disability group, but were not significant after controlling for total gray matter volume. Thus, the orbitofrontal and posterior superior temporal sulcus gray matter findings are relatively reliable effects that appear to be dependent on cases with low total gray matter volume. The results are considered in the context of genetics studies linking orbitofrontal and superior temporal sulcus regions to alleles that confer risk for reading disability.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDyslexiaFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityGray MatterHumansMaleTemporal LobeYoung Adultdyslexiamultisiteorbitofrontal gyrusreading disabilitysuperior temporal sulcusvoxel-based gray matter

Identifiers

PMID26835509
PMCPMC4724065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.