Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26835420›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2016

The Influence of C-Ions and X-rays on Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells.

Alexander Helm, Ryonfa Lee, Marco Durante, Sylvia Ritter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biological effects of high-LET irradiation on the circulatory system.International journal of radiation biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. High-LET charged particles: radiobiology and application for new approaches in radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander HelmDepartment of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research , Darmstadt , Germany.
Ryonfa LeeDepartment of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research , Darmstadt , Germany.
Marco DuranteDepartment of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany; Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Sylvia RitterDepartment of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research , Darmstadt , Germany.
GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research · DETechnical University of Darmstadt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage to the endothelium of blood vessels, which may occur during radiotherapy, is discussed as a potential precursor to the development of cardiovascular disease. We thus chose human umbilical vein endothelial cells as a model system to examine the effect of low- and high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. Cells were exposed to 250 kV X-rays or carbon ions (C-ions) with the energies of either 9.8 MeV/u (LET = 170 keV/μm) or 91 MeV/u (LET = 28 keV/μm). Subculture of cells was performed regularly up to 46 days (~22 population doublings) post-irradiation. Immediately after exposure, cells were seeded for the colony forming assay. Additionally, at regular intervals, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) (JC-1 staining) and cellular senescence (senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining) were assessed. Cytogenetic damage was investigated by the micronucleus assay and the high-resolution multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) technique. Analysis of radiation-induced damage shortly after exposure showed that C-ions are more effective than X-rays with respect to cell inactivation or the induction of cytogenetic damage (micronucleus assay) as observed in other cell systems. For 9.8 and 91 MeV/u C-ions, relative biological effectiveness values of 2.4 and 1.5 were obtained for cell inactivation. At the subsequent time points, the number of micronucleated cells decreased to the control level. Analysis of chromosomal damage by mFISH technique revealed aberrations frequently involving chromosome 13 irrespective of dose or radiation quality. Disruption of the MMP was seen only a few days after exposure to X-rays or C-ions. Cellular senescence was not altered by radiation at any time point investigated. Altogether, our data indicate that shortly after exposure C-ions were more effective in damaging endothelial cells than X-rays. However, late damage to endothelial cells was not found for the applied conditions and endpoints.

Indexed as

carbon ionscarbon ion therapycardiovascular diseasechromosome 13endothelial cellshigh-LET radiationmicronucleus formationsenescence-associated β-galactosidase

Identifiers

PMID26835420
PMCPMC4718996
OpenAlexW2266411412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.