Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26835134›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2016

Rationale for and design of the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-PRospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) registry.

Emily C O'Brien, Michael T Durheim, Victoria Gamerman, Sandy Garfinkel, Kevin J Anstrom, Scott M Palmer, Craig S Conoscenti

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01915511 (Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01915511 recruitingnot on this map

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) and Interstitial Lung Disease Prospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO/ILD-PRO) Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDuke UniversityRan2014 to 2031Enrolled3,000ConditionsIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Interstitial Lung Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily C O'BrienDepartment of Medicine , Duke University, Duke Clinical Research Institute , Durham, North Carolina , USA.
Michael T DurheimDepartment of Medicine , Duke University, Duke Clinical Research Institute , Durham, North Carolina , USA.
Victoria GamermanBiometrics and Data Management , Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Ridgefield, Connecticut , USA.
Sandy GarfinkelClinical Operations , Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Ridgefield, Connecticut , USA.
Kevin J AnstromDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics , Duke Clinical Research Institute , Durham, North Carolina , USA.
Scott M PalmerDepartment of Medicine , Duke University, Duke Clinical Research Institute , Durham, North Carolina , USA.
Craig S ConoscentiClinical Development and Medical Affairs , Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Ridgefield, Connecticut , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic interstitial lung disease characterised by progressive loss of lung function. Its clinical course is variable but ultimately fatal. There is a need for a multicentre patient registry incorporating longitudinal clinical data and biological samples to improve understanding of the natural history of IPF and contemporary practice patterns. METHODS/

designThe Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-PRospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) registry is a national IPF registry in the USA. This registry will enrol approximately 300 patients with newly diagnosed IPF over 2 years at approximately 14 tertiary pulmonary care sites. Participants will be followed for 3-5 years and will receive usual care, as defined by their physician. Clinical data from the year prior to diagnosis will be collected from medical record review on enrolment. Subsequently, data on diagnostic evaluations, pulmonary function tests, physical examinations, laboratory data and clinical events will be collected at routine clinical visits and via a call centre. Participants will complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires at enrolment and then at approximately 6-month intervals. Blood samples for cellular, genetic and transcriptomic analyses will be collected at the same intervals.

resultsThe first results from the IPF-PRO registry will be presented in 2015.

conclusionsThe IPF-PRO registry will improve understanding of the natural history of IPF, its impact on patients and current practice in the diagnosis and care of patients with IPF. The registry will establish a repository of biological samples from a well-characterised patient population for future research. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01915511.

Indexed as

Interstitial FibrosisRare lung diseases

Identifiers

PMID26835134
PMCPMC4716211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.