Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26835050›Full record

ArticleArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2013

Natriuretic Peptides as Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrences Following Electrical Cardioversion.

Theodoros A Zografos, Demosthenes G Katritsis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Biochemical Cardiac Markers in Atrial Fibrillation.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. RBM20 phosphorylation and its role in nucleocytoplasmic transport and cardiac pathogenesis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  9. RBM20Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theodoros A ZografosAthens Euroclinic, Department of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Athens, Greece.
Demosthenes G KatritsisAthens Euroclinic, Department of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Athens, Greece.
Athens Euroclinic · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) can be effective in restoring sinus rhythm (SR) in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors that predispose to AF recurrences, such as age, AF duration and left atrial size have been used to guide a decision for cardioversion, but increasing evidence suggests that they may be rather poor markers of left atrial structural remodeling that determines the long-term success of a rhythm control strategy. In this context, the use of easily obtainable biomarkers, such as the levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), to predict AF recurrences may be preferable. Since ANP production is associated with the extent of functional atrial myocardium, and both ANP and BNP reflect atrial pressure and mechanical stretching, these peptides are good candidate biomarkers to assess predisposition to AF recurrences. In this review we focus on the pathophysiological mechanisms and the available clinical evidence regarding the prediction of AF recurrences following successful ECV from pre-procedural ANP and BNP levels.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationatrial natriuretic peptideB-type natriuretic peptideelectrical cardioversion

Identifiers

PMID26835050
PMCPMC4711521
OpenAlexW2322097037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.