Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26835039›Full record

ArticleArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2013

Outcomes in Women Undergoing Electrophysiological Procedures.

Pasquale Santangeli, Luigi Di Biase, Eloisa Basile, Amin Al-Ahmad, Andrea Natale

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive atrial fibrillation burden and symptom reduction post-ablation: insights from DECAAF II.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pasquale SantangeliDivision of Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, US; Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Texas, US; Department of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Luigi Di BiaseTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Texas, US; Department of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Eloisa BasileInstitute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Amin Al-AhmadDivision of Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, US.
Andrea NataleDivision of Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, US; Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Texas, US.
Stanford University · USSt David's Medical Center · USTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of invasive electrophysiological procedures is steadily increasing in Western countries, as the age of the population increases and technologies advance. In recent years, gender-related differences in cardiac rhythm disorders have been increasingly appreciated, which can potentially have a great impact on the outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures. Among supraventricular arrhythmias, women have a higher incidence of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and a significantly lower incidence of atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia compared with males, and present to ablation procedures later and after having failed more antiarrhythmic drugs. The results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in women have been reported worse than in men. This finding is possibly due to a later referral of females to ablation procedures, who present older and with a higher incidence of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. With regard to cardiac device implantation procedures, a smaller survival benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has been shown in women, essentially due to gender-specific differences in the clinical course of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, with women dying predominantly from non-arrhythmic causes. On the other side, the clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronisation therapy seems to be more favourable in women, who experience a greater degree of reverse left ventricular remodelling and a striking decrease of heart failure events or mortality after biventricular pacing. This review will summarise the available evidence on gender-related differences in outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures.

Indexed as

cardiac resynchronisation therapydefibrillatorsGender differencesimplantable deviceradiofrequency catheter ablation

Identifiers

PMID26835039
PMCPMC4711560
OpenAlexW2315874106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.