Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834856›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biosciences2015

Data-adaptive Shrinkage via the Hyperpenalized EM Algorithm.

Philip S Boonstra, Jeremy M G Taylor, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip S BoonstraDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Hts., Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Tel. +1 (734) 615-1580.
Jeremy M G TaylorDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Hts., Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Tel. +1 (734) 615-1580.
Bhramar MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Hts., Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Tel. +1 (734) 615-1580.

Funding

Biostatistics Training Program in Cancer ResearchT32CA083654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Kelley McLain Kidwell · 2002 to 2026
$4.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer BiomarkersR01CA129102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS, TAYLOR, JEREMY M.G. · 2009 to 2021
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129102NCI NIH HHS T32 CA083654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose an extension of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, called the hyperpenalized EM (HEM) algorithm, that maximizes a penalized log-likelihood, for which some data are missing or unavailable, using a data-adaptive estimate of the penalty parameter. This is potentially useful in applications for which the analyst is unable or unwilling to choose a single value of a penalty parameter but instead can posit a plausible range of values. The HEM algorithm is conceptually straightforward and also very effective, and we demonstrate its utility in the analysis of a genomic data set. Gene expression measurements and clinical covariates were used to predict survival time. However, many survival times are censored, and some observations only contain expression measurements derived from a different assay, which together constitute a difficult missing data problem. It is desired to shrink the genomic contribution in a data-adaptive way. The HEM algorithm successfully handles both the missing data and shrinkage aspects of the problem.

Indexed as

EM algorithmhyperparameterhyperpenaltymissing datapenalized likelihoodprediction

Identifiers

PMID26834856
PMCPMC4728141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.