ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016
Microbial Profiling of a Suppressiveness-Induced Agricultural Soil Amended with Composted Almond Shells.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- An observational comparative study of Hass avocado fruit quality and its associations with rhizosphere soil properties across four representative orchards in China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Enhancement of production of pathogen-suppressing volatiles using amino acids.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Seasonal Shifts in Bacterial Community Structures in the Lateral Root of Sugar Beet Grown in an Andosol Field in Japan.Microbes and environments · 2023Article
- Nitrogen fertilization rates mediate rhizosphere soil carbon emissions of continuous peanut monoculture by altering cellulose-specific microbess.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Interplay between rhizosphericFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Indicative bacterial communities and taxa of disease-suppressing and growth-promoting composts and their associations to the rhizoplane.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2021Article
- Nematicidal Amendments and Soil Remediation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Harnessing the Microbiomes of Suppressive Composts for Plant Protection: From Metagenomes to Beneficial Microorganisms and Reliable Diagnostics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Almond processing residues as a source of organic acid biopesticides during biosolarization.Waste management (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Article
- Soil Application of a Formulated Biocontrol Rhizobacterium,Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Deciphering Microbiome Related to Rusty Roots ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Fitness Features Involved in the Biocontrol Interaction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Barcoded Pyrosequencing Reveals a Shift in the Bacterial Community in the Rhizosphere and Rhizoplane of Rehmannia glutinosa under Consecutive Monoculture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Comparative Microbiome Analysis of a Fusarium Wilt Suppressive Soil and a Fusarium Wilt Conducive Soil From the Châteaurenard Region.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on the microbial profile present in an agricultural soil that becomes suppressive after the application of composted almond shells (AS) as organic amendments. For this purpose, we analyzed the functions and composition of the complex communities present in an experimental orchard of 40-year-old avocado trees, many of them historically amended with composted almond shells. The role of microbes in the suppression of Rosellinia necatrix, the causative agent of avocado white root rot, was determined after heat-treatment and complementation experiments with different types of soil. Bacterial and fungal profiles obtained from natural soil samples based on the 16S rRNA gene and ITS sequencing revealed slight differences among the amended (AS) and unamended (CT) soils. When the soil was under the influence of composted almond shells as organic amendments, an increase in Proteobacteria and Ascomycota groups was observed, as well as a reduction in Acidobacteria and Mortierellales. Complementary to these findings, functional analysis by GeoChip 4.6 confirmed these subtle differences, mainly present in the relative abundance of genes involved in the carbon cycle. Interestingly, a group of specific probes included in the "soil benefit" category was present only in AS-amended soils, corresponding to specific microorganisms previously described as potential biocontrol agents, such as Pseudomonas spp., Burkholderia spp., or Actinobacteria. Considering the results of both analyses, we determined that AS-amendments to the soil led to an increase in some orders of Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Dothideomycetes, as well as a reduction in the abundance of Xylariales fungi (where R. necatrix is allocated). The combination of microbial action and substrate properties of suppressiveness are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.