Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834706›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2015

Bacterial Vaginosis Biofilms: Challenges to Current Therapies and Emerging Solutions.

Daniela Machado, Joana Castro, Ana Palmeira-de-Oliveira, José Martinez-de-Oliveira, Nuno Cerca

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contribution ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Gut-Vagina Axis.Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulatory Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hallmarks of Bacterial Vaginosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela MachadoLaboratory of Research in Biofilms Rosário Oliveira, Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho Braga, Portugal.
Joana CastroLaboratory of Research in Biofilms Rosário Oliveira, Centre of Biological Engineering, University of MinhoBraga, Portugal; Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do PortoPorto, Portugal.
Ana Palmeira-de-OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira InteriorCovilhã, Portugal; Labfit, Health Products Research and Development LdaCovilhã, Portugal.
José Martinez-de-OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira InteriorCovilhã, Portugal; Child and Woman's Health Department, Centro Hospitalar Cova da BeiraCovilhã, Portugal.
Nuno CercaLaboratory of Research in Biofilms Rosário Oliveira, Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho Braga, Portugal.
University of Beira Interior · PTUniversity of Minho · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common genital tract infection in women during their reproductive years and it has been associated with serious health complications, such as preterm delivery and acquisition or transmission of several sexually transmitted agents. BV is characterized by a reduction of beneficial lactobacilli and a significant increase in number of anaerobic bacteria, including Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Mobiluncus spp., Bacteroides spp. and Prevotella spp.. Being polymicrobial in nature, BV etiology remains unclear. However, it is certain that BV involves the presence of a thick vaginal multi-species biofilm, where G. vaginalis is the predominant species. Similar to what happens in many other biofilm-related infections, standard antibiotics, like metronidazole, are unable to fully eradicate the vaginal biofilm, which can explain the high recurrence rates of BV. Furthermore, antibiotic therapy can also cause a negative impact on the healthy vaginal microflora. These issues sparked the interest in developing alternative therapeutic strategies. This review provides a quick synopsis of the currently approved and available antibiotics for BV treatment while presenting an overview of novel strategies that are being explored for the treatment of this disorder, with special focus on natural compounds that are able to overcome biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

antibioticsbacterial vaginosisbiofilmsemerging therapiesGardnerella vaginalis

Identifiers

PMID26834706
PMCPMC4718981
OpenAlexW2196970383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.