Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834632›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2015

Therapeutic Value of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Inhibitors in Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Fabiola Martin, Chiedu Ufodiama, Ian Watt, Martin Bland, William J Brackenbury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Targeting Ion Channels for Cancer Treatment: Current Progress and Future Challenges.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Ion Channels in Lung Cancer.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sodium homeostasis in the tumour microenvironment.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Is there a role for voltage-gated Na+ channels in the aggressiveness of breast cancer?Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabiola MartinDepartment of Biology, University of YorkYork, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of YorkYork, UK.
Chiedu UfodiamaHull York Medical School, University of York York, UK.
Ian WattDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York York, UK.
Martin BlandDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York York, UK.
William J BrackenburyDepartment of Biology, University of York York, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although survival rates of breast, colon, and prostate cancers are improving, deaths from these tumors frequently occur due to metastasis. Voltage-gated Na(+) channels (VGSCs) are membrane proteins, which regulate membrane current and cellular migration during nervous system organogenesis. VGSCs are also expressed in fibroblasts, immune cells, glia, and metastatic cancer cells. VGSCs regulate migration and invasion of breast, bowel, and prostate cancer cells, suggesting that they may be novel anti-metastatic targets. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies testing the effects of VGSC-inhibiting drugs in cancer. Two-hundred and four publications were identified, of which two human, two mouse, and 20 in vitro publications were included. In the clinical studies, the effect of these drugs on survival and metastatic relapse is not clear. The 22 preclinical studies collectively suggest that several VGSC-inhibiting drugs inhibit cancer proliferation, migration, and invasion. None of the human and only six of the preclinical studies directly investigated the effect of the drugs on VGSC activity. Studies were difficult to compare due to lack of standardized methodology and outcome measures. We conclude that the benefits of VGSC inhibitors require further investigation. Standardization of future studies and outcome measures should enable meaningful study comparisons.

Indexed as

anticonvulsantsbreast neoplasmscolonic neoplasmsprostatic neoplasmssodium channels

Identifiers

PMID26834632
PMCPMC4714608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.