Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834581›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015

The Monitoring and Control of Task Sequences in Human and Non-Human Primates.

Theresa M Desrochers, Diana C Burk, David Badre, David L Sheinberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Shared and unique neural correlates of reappraisal generation and implementation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Feature Integration in Motor Sequences: Implications for Abstract Task Sequence Studies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Attention: The Messy Reality.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Spatiotemporal encoding of search strategies by prefrontal neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theresa M DesrochersDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University Providence, RI, USA.
Diana C BurkDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University Providence, RI, USA.
David BadreDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityProvidence, RI, USA; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidence, RI, USA.
David L SheinbergDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Dynamic Visual Activity in Temporal CortexR01EY014681 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEINBERG, DAVID L · 2004 to 2017
$3.7M
Training Programs in Systems and Behavioral NeuroscienceT32MH019118 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CONNORS, BARRY W · 1989 to 2013
$1.9M
Cognitive control and the functional organization of frontal cortexR01NS065046 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BADRE, DAVID · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Investigation of the control and monitoring of task sequencesF32NS080593 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI DESROCHERS, THERESA MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$159k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014681NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019118NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS080593NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our ability to plan and execute a series of tasks leading to a desired goal requires remarkable coordination between sensory, motor, and decision-related systems. Prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to play a central role in this coordination, especially when actions must be assembled extemporaneously and cannot be programmed as a rote series of movements. A central component of this flexible behavior is the moment-by-moment allocation of working memory and attention. The ubiquity of sequence planning in our everyday lives belies the neural complexity that supports this capacity, and little is known about how frontal cortical regions orchestrate the monitoring and control of sequential behaviors. For example, it remains unclear if and how sensory cortical areas, which provide essential driving inputs for behavior, are modulated by the frontal cortex during these tasks. Here, we review what is known about moment-to-moment monitoring as it relates to visually guided, rule-driven behaviors that change over time. We highlight recent human work that shows how the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) participates in monitoring during task sequences. Neurophysiological data from monkeys suggests that monitoring may be accomplished by neurons that respond to items within the sequence and may in turn influence the tuning properties of neurons in posterior sensory areas. Understanding the interplay between proceduralized or habitual acts and supervised control of sequences is key to our understanding of sequential task execution. A crucial bridge will be the use of experimental protocols that allow for the examination of the functional homology between monkeys and humans. We illustrate how task sequences may be parceled into components and examined experimentally, thereby opening future avenues of investigation into the neural basis of sequential monitoring and control.

Indexed as

attentionelectrophysiologyexecutive functionsfrontal corteximaging studiesmonitoringsequential controlTMS

Identifiers

PMID26834581
PMCPMC4720743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.