Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834536›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2015

Evaluation of Models of Parkinson's Disease.

Shail A Jagmag, Naveen Tripathi, Sunil D Shukla, Sankar Maiti, Sukant Khurana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors in Toxic Models of Parkinsonism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for biomarker discovery in theNeuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shail A JagmagDepartment of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, India.
Naveen TripathiDepartment of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, India.
Sunil D ShuklaDepartment of Zoology, Government Meera Girl's College Udaipur, India.
Sankar MaitiDepartment of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, India.
Sukant KhuranaDepartment of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases. Animal models have contributed a large part to our understanding and therapeutics developed for treatment of PD. There are several more exhaustive reviews of literature that provide the initiated insights into the specific models; however a novel synthesis of the basic advantages and disadvantages of different models is much needed. Here we compare both neurotoxin based and genetic models while suggesting some novel avenues in PD modeling. We also highlight the problems faced and promises of all the mammalian models with the hope of providing a framework for comparison of various systems.

Indexed as

genetic modelslewy bodiesneurodegenerationParkinsonian DisordersParkinson's Diseasesubstantia nigra pars compacta (SNc)toxin modelsventral tegmental area (VTA)

Identifiers

PMID26834536
PMCPMC4718050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.