Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834524›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2015

Clinical results of proton beam therapy for twenty older patients with esophageal cancer.

Takashi Ono, Tatsuya Nakamura, Yusuke Azami, Hisashi Yamaguchi, Yuichiro Hayashi, Motohisa Suzuki, Yoshiomi Hatayama, Iwao Tsukiyama, Masato Hareyama, Yasuhiro Kikuchi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current status and application of proton therapy for esophageal cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review of clinical results of charged-particle therapy for esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi OnoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Tatsuya NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Yusuke AzamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Hisashi YamaguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Yuichiro HayashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Motohisa SuzukiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Yoshiomi HatayamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Iwao TsukiyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Masato HareyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Yasuhiro KikuchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Kenji NemotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Southern Tohoku General Hospital · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an aging society, increasing number of older patients are diagnosed with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for older patients with esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsOlder patients (age: ≥ 65 years) newly diagnosed with esophageal cancer between January 2009 and June 2013 were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent either proton beam therapy alone or proton beam therapy with initial X-ray irradiation. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

resultsTwenty patients were eligible for this study and all completed the treatment. The median age was 78 years (range: 65-89 years) and the median follow-up time was 26.5 months (range: 6-62 months). Seven patients had lymph node metastases and 10 had stage II/III cancer. The median dose of proton beam therapy was 72.6 Gy relative biological dose effectiveness (RBE) (range: 66-74.8 Gy [RBE]) for proton beam therapy alone and 33 Gy (RBE) (range: 30.8-39.6 Gy [RBE]; total dose range: 66.8-75.6 Gy [RBE]) for proton beam therapy with initial X-ray irradiation. The 2-year overall survival rate was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.4%-100%), and the 2-year local control rate was 89.4% (95% CI: 75.5%-100%). Grade 2 or 3 toxicities occurred in some cases; however, no grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed.

conclusionsHigh-dose (66-75.6 Gy [RBE]) proton beam therapy without chemotherapy was an efficacious and safe treatment for older patients with esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

agedesophageal neoplasmsproton therapyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID26834524
PMCPMC4722928
OpenAlexW2284986085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.