Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834429›Full record

ArticleJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine

Weighted mean: A possible method to express overall Dhatu Sarata.

Chandar Prakash Gunawat, Girish Singh, Kishor Patwardhan, Sangeeta Gehlot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chandar Prakash GunawatDepartment of Kriya Sharir, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Girish SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Community Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Kishor PatwardhanDepartment of Kriya Sharir, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sangeeta GehlotDepartment of Kriya Sharir, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several questions are being raised regarding the accuracy of the methods of diagnosis and reporting of various clinical parameters according to Ayurveda in recent times. Uniformity in reporting, issues related to inter-rater variability, uniformity in applying statistical tests, reliability, consistency, and validation of various tools, - are some of the major concerns that are being voiced. Dhatu Sarata is one such domain where no substantial work has been carried out to address these issues. The Sanskrit term "Dhatu" roughly translates as a "tissue." Sarata stands for the status of Dhatu in a given individual, i.e., it describes whether the status is excellent, moderate, or poor. In the available research literature, there are several gaps while dealing with and reporting the clinical assessment of Dhatu. Most of the workers group an individual into any one of the categories of Dhatu Sarata, and this approach neglects the contribution of other Dhatus to the overall Sarata in that individual. In this communication, we propose the usefulness of "weighted mean" in expressing the overall Sarata in an individual. This gives the researcher a freedom of not classifying an individual into any one group of Sarata, while also simultaneously allowing him/her to retain the focus on the status of an individual Dhatu.

Indexed as

Dhatu Saratamethodsreporting

Identifiers

PMID26834429
PMCPMC4719490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.