ArticleUrology annals
Outcome of buccal mucosa and lingual mucosa graft urethroplasty in the management of urethral strictures: A comparative study.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lingual versus buccal mucosal graft for augmentation urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity.International urology and nephrology · 2021Pooled it
- Results of Use of Tissue-Engineered Autologous Oral Mucosa Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Trial.EBioMedicine · 2017Trial
- Impact of Coverage with an Acellular Dermal Matrix and Suturing Versus Primary Closure on Tongue Pain and Oral Morbidity After Lingual Mucosa Harvesting for Urethroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Buccal versus lingual mucosal grafts for anterior urethral stricture management: A prospective surgical outcome and morbidity comparison.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Article
- The urinary and sexual outcomes of buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty versus end-to-end anastomosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of oral morbidity and mid-term efficacy of anterior urethroplasty using an autologous tissue-engineered graft (MukoCell®) versus native oral mucosa graft.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2023Observational
- Buccal mucosa for use in urethral reconstruction: evolution of use over the last 30 years.Frontiers in urology · 2023Review
- Dorsal oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for female urethral stricture reconstruction: A narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Prospects and Challenges of Electrospun Cell and Drug Delivery Vehicles to Correct Urethral Stricture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Buccal Mucosa Graft Harvest in Children and Young Adults: Case Series and Harvest Technique.Cureus · 2021Article
- Surgical repair of urethral complications after metoidioplasty for genital gender affirming surgery.International journal of impotence research · 2020Article
- Robotic transanal minimally invasive rectal mucosa harvest.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty 12 years later: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian journal of urology · 2019Review
- Histopathological changes in oral mucosa in cases of failed augmented urethroplasty.Turkish journal of urology · 2019Article
- Technique for single-stage reconstruction of obliterative or near-obliterative long urethral strictures in circumcised patients.Investigative and clinical urology · 2018Article
- Lingual mucosal graft two-stage Bracka technique for redo hypospadias repair.Arab journal of urology · 2017Article
- Looking beyond oral mucosa: Initial results of everted saphenous vein graft urethroplasty (eSVGU) in long anterior urethral strictures.Arab journal of urology · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the study was to compare the outcome of buccal and lingual mucosa graft (LMG) augmentation urethroplasty along with donor sites morbidities in anterior urethra stricture. SUBJECTS AND
methodsFrom September 2010 to January 2014, 125 patients underwent single stage augmentation urethroplasty. They were randomly divided into two groups to receive either buccal mucosa graft (BMG) or LMG. The patients were prospectively followed for complications and outcome.
resultsBaseline characteristics such as mean age, etiology, stricture length, and location were comparable in both groups. Overall success rate for Group 1 and Group 2 were 69.2% and 80%, respectively. Mean follow-up periods were 28.2 and 25 months in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively.
conclusionsLMG provides the better outcome with fewer immediate and delayed complications as compared to BMG. The length of stricture and width of graft were main factors affecting the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.