Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834190›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2017

Women's interest in a personal breast cancer risk assessment and lifestyle advice at NHS mammography screening.

B A Fisher, L Wilkinson, A Valencia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Public and Healthcare Professional Attitudes Towards Risk-Stratified Bowel Screening: A Qualitative Study Using an Info-Comic Book.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Public Preferences for Determining Eligibility for Screening in Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening Programs: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Black Women's Perspectives on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2023
    Article
  13. A community jury study exploring the public acceptability of using risk stratification to determine eligibility for cancer screening.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility for screening: A population-based survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B A FisherInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
L WilkinsonSouth West London Breast Screening Service, The Rose Centre, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, Perimeter Road, London SW17 0QT, UK.
A ValenciaAvon Breast Screening, The Bristol Breast Care Centre, Beaufort House, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GBSt George's Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although mortality from breast cancer is declining, incidence continues to increase and is often detected at routine NHS screening. Most middle aged and older women in England attend for screening every 3 years. Assessing their personal breast cancer risk and providing preventative lifestyle advice could help to further reduce breast cancer incidence. Methods: A cross-sectional, self-complete postal survey measured attendees' interest in having a personal risk assessment, expected impact on screening attendance, knowledge of associations between lifestyle and breast cancer and preferred ways of accessing preventative lifestyle advice. Results: A total of 1803/4948 (36.4%) completed questionnaires were returned. Most participants (93.7%) expressed interest in a personal risk assessment and 95% (1713/1803) believed it would make no difference or encourage re-attendance. Two-thirds (1208/1803) associated lifestyle with breast cancer, but many were unaware of specific risks such as weight gain, obesity, alcohol consumption and physical inactivity. NHS sourced advice was expected to be more credible than other sources, and booklets, brief counselling or an interactive website were most preferred for accessing this. Conclusions: Attendees appear to welcome an intervention that would facilitate more proactive clinical and lifestyle prevention and address critical research gaps in breast cancer prevention and early detection.

Indexed as

CounselingEarly Detection of CancerAgedBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansLife StyleLondonMammographyMiddle AgedState MedicineSurveys and Questionnairescancerhealth promotionscreening

Identifiers

PMID26834190
PMCPMC5356472
OpenAlexW2258405045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.