Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26834104›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2016

Mouse Models of Breast Cancer: Platforms for Discovering Precision Imaging Diagnostics and Future Cancer Medicine.

H Charles Manning, Jason R Buck, Rebecca S Cook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H Charles ManningVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee; and Vanderbilt Center for Molecular Probes, Nashville, Tennessee henry.c.manning@vanderbilt.edu.
Jason R BuckVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee; and Vanderbilt Center for Molecular Probes, Nashville, Tennessee.
Rebecca S CookVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI STACIE B DUSETZINA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
TISSUE CoreP50CA098131 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO, PIETENPOL, JENNIFER A · 2003 to 2024
$48.7M
Understanding and Controlling p120 Dysfunction in CRCP50CA095103 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COFFEY, ROBERT J. · 2002 to 2017
$33.6M
TSPO Ligands for Cancer ImagingR01CA163806 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MANNING, HENRY CHARLES · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
HER3 Signaling in Development and Cancer of the BreastR01CA143126 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, REBECCA SARA · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA163806NCI NIH HHS 5P50CA098131NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095103NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098131NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143126NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representing an enormous health care and socioeconomic challenge, breast cancer is the second most common cancer in the world and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Although many of the challenges associated with preventing, treating, and ultimately curing breast cancer are addressable in the laboratory, successful translation of groundbreaking research to clinical populations remains an important barrier. Particularly when compared with research on other types of solid tumors, breast cancer research is hampered by a lack of tractable in vivo model systems that accurately recapitulate the relevant clinical features of the disease. A primary objective of this article was to provide a generalizable overview of the types of in vivo model systems, with an emphasis primarily on murine models, that are widely deployed in preclinical breast cancer research. Major opportunities to advance precision cancer medicine facilitated by molecular imaging of preclinical breast cancer models are discussed.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMolecular ImagingNeoplasm TransplantationPrecision MedicineRadionuclide Imaginganimal imagingbreast cancercoclinical trialsmolecular imagingmouse modelsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID26834104
PMCPMC6231414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.