Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2016
Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive, Integrated Care for First Episode Psychosis in the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program.
Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing Evidence-Based Practice for Youth and Emerging Adults With Early Psychosis: Implementation and Evaluation in Diverse Service Settings
Adapting and Improving Transition Care for First Episode Psychosis
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Economic Evaluation of Early Psychosis Interventions From A Canadian Perspective.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2022Pooled it
- Economic analyses of supported employment programmes for people with mental health conditions: A systematic review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022Pooled it
- Specialised early intervention teams (extended time) for recent-onset psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Specialised early intervention teams for recent-onset psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations of Psychological Therapies for Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early-Phase Psychosis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.JAMA psychiatry · 2018Pooled it
- The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs social skills training in schizophrenia: a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness evaluation.BMC psychiatry · 2022Trial
- A Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial of a Combined Clinical Treatment for First-Episode Psychosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Economic Evaluation of Extended Early Intervention Service vs Regular Care Following 2 Years of Early Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2021Trial
- Delegating Clozapine Monitoring to Advanced Nurse Practitioners: An Exploratory, Randomized Study to Assess the Effect on Prescription and Its Safety.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020Trial
- Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Cost of Illness Analysis.Journal of abnormal child psychology · 2020Trial
- Predictors of Hospitalization of Individuals With First-Episode Psychosis: Data From a 2-Year Follow-Up of the RAISE-ETP.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2019Trial
- An Economic Evaluation of Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Services for First-Episode Psychosis in the U.S. Public Sector.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2018Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis in Latin America: economic evaluation of Chilean services.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Availability and effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for early psychosis in 20 low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares the cost-effectiveness of Navigate (NAV), a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, team-based treatment approach for first episode psychosis (FEP) and usual Community Care (CC) in a cluster randomization trial. Patients at 34 community treatment clinics were randomly assigned to either NAV (N = 223) or CC (N = 181) for 2 years. Effectiveness was measured as a one standard deviation change on the Quality of Life Scale (QLS-SD). Incremental cost effectiveness ratios were evaluated with bootstrap distributions. The Net Health Benefits Approach was used to evaluate the probability that the value of NAV benefits exceeded its costs relative to CC from the perspective of the health care system. The NAV group improved significantly more on the QLS and had higher outpatient mental health and antipsychotic medication costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $12 081/QLS-SD, with a .94 probability that NAV was more cost-effective than CC at $40 000/QLS-SD. When converted to monetized Quality Adjusted Life Years, NAV benefits exceeded costs, especially at future generic drug prices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.