Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833854›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2016

Capturing Biological Activity in Natural Product Fragments by Chemical Synthesis.

Erika A Crane, Karl Gademann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. 4(3International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Switching Residues: A Platform for the Synthesis of Fidaxomicin Antibiotics.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chemical Evolution of Natural Product Structure.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Pseudo Natural Products-Chemical Evolution of Natural Product Structure.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erika A CraneDepartment of Chemistry, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Karl GademannDepartment of Chemistry, University of Basel, Switzerland. karl.gademann@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-0689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products have had an immense influence on science and have directly led to the introduction of many drugs. Organic chemistry, and its unique ability to tailor natural products through synthesis, provides an extraordinary approach to unlock the full potential of natural products. In this Review, an approach based on natural product derived fragments is presented that can successfully address some of the current challenges in drug discovery. These fragments often display significantly reduced molecular weights, reduced structural complexity, a reduced number of synthetic steps, while retaining or even improving key biological parameters such as potency or selectivity. Examples from various stages of the drug development process up to the clinic are presented. In addition, this process can be leveraged by recent developments such as genome mining, antibody-drug conjugates, and computational approaches. All these concepts have the potential to identify the next generation of drug candidates inspired by natural products.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ProductsDrug DiscoveryHumansBiological Productsdrug discoverymedicinal chemistrynatural productsorganic chemistryorganic synthesis

Identifiers

PMID26833854
PMCPMC4797711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.