Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833806›Full record

ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2016

Epistasis in protein evolution.

Tyler N Starr, Joseph W Thornton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 329 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
329citing papers in PubMed
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

329 citing papers in PubMed, 614 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Evolutionary profiles for protein fitness prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  9. Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Amplicon/Protein Bead Display enables quantitativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

269 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tyler N StarrGraduate Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637.
Joseph W ThorntonDepartments of Ecology and Evolution and Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Molecular And Cellular Biology Training ProgramT32GM007183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GLICK, BENJAMIN S, RICE, PHOEBE A · 1985 to 2021
$23.9M
Mechanisms for the evolution of novel DNA specificity in a transcription factor fR01GM104397 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI THORNTON, JOSEPH W · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104397NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure, function, and evolution of proteins depend on physical and genetic interactions among amino acids. Recent studies have used new strategies to explore the prevalence, biochemical mechanisms, and evolutionary implications of these interactions-called epistasis-within proteins. Here we describe an emerging picture of pervasive epistasis in which the physical and biological effects of mutations change over the course of evolution in a lineage-specific fashion. Epistasis can restrict the trajectories available to an evolving protein or open new paths to sequences and functions that would otherwise have been inaccessible. We describe two broad classes of epistatic interactions, which arise from different physical mechanisms and have different effects on evolutionary processes. Specific epistasis-in which one mutation influences the phenotypic effect of few other mutations-is caused by direct and indirect physical interactions between mutations, which nonadditively change the protein's physical properties, such as conformation, stability, or affinity for ligands. In contrast, nonspecific epistasis describes mutations that modify the effect of many others; these typically behave additively with respect to the physical properties of a protein but exhibit epistasis because of a nonlinear relationship between the physical properties and their biological effects, such as function or fitness. Both types of interaction are rampant, but specific epistasis has stronger effects on the rate and outcomes of evolution, because it imposes stricter constraints and modulates evolutionary potential more dramatically; it therefore makes evolution more contingent on low-probability historical events and leaves stronger marks on the sequences, structures, and functions of protein families.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticMutationBinding SitesCell LineageComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularHumansProtein BindingProteinsSelection, GeneticProteinsancestral sequence reconstructiondeep mutational scanningepistasisevolutionary biochemistryprotein evolutionsequence-function relationshipsequence space

Identifiers

PMID26833806
PMCPMC4918427
OpenAlexW2471654536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.