Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833494›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2016

Incorporating Functional Genomic Information in Genetic Association Studies Using an Empirical Bayes Approach.

Amy V Spencer, Angela Cox, Wei-Yu Lin, Douglas F Easton, Kyriaki Michailidou, Kevin Walters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fine-mapping genetic associations.Human molecular genetics · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy V SpencerAdvanced Analytics Centre, Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
Angela CoxDepartment of Oncology, Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Wei-Yu LinDepartment of Oncology, Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Douglas F EastonDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kyriaki MichailidouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kevin WaltersSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

Epidemiologic StudiesU19CA148065 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL, BRUGGE, JOAN SIEFERT · 2010 to 2014
$10.6M
Epidemiological and Clinical Translational Studies Post Genome-Wide AssociationU19CA148537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EASTON, DOUGLAS FREDERICK, EELES, ROSALIND · 2010 to 2014
$10.4M
Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
A genome-wide association study for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriersR01CA128978 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2008 to 2012
$4.8M
Cancer Research UK 10118Cancer Research UK 16563Cancer Research UK C12292/A11174Cancer Research UK C1281/A12014Cancer Research UK C1287/A10118Cancer Research UK C1287/A10710Cancer Research UK C5047/A10692Cancer Research UK C5047/A15007Cancer Research UK C5047/A8384CIHRNCI NIH HHS 1U19 CA148065NCI NIH HHS 1U19 CA148112NCI NIH HHS 1U19 CA148537NCI NIH HHS CA128978NCI NIH HHS R01 CA128978NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148065NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large amount of functional genetic data available, which can be used to inform fine-mapping association studies (in diseases with well-characterised disease pathways). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) prioritization via Bayes factors is attractive because prior information can inform the effect size or the prior probability of causal association. This approach requires the specification of the effect size. If the information needed to estimate a priori the probability density for the effect sizes for causal SNPs in a genomic region isn't consistent or isn't available, then specifying a prior variance for the effect sizes is challenging. We propose both an empirical method to estimate this prior variance, and a coherent approach to using SNP-level functional data, to inform the prior probability of causal association. Through simulation we show that when ranking SNPs by our empirical Bayes factor in a fine-mapping study, the causal SNP rank is generally as high or higher than the rank using Bayes factors with other plausible values of the prior variance. Importantly, we also show that assigning SNP-specific prior probabilities of association based on expert prior functional knowledge of the disease mechanism can lead to improved causal SNPs ranks compared to ranking with identical prior probabilities of association. We demonstrate the use of our methods by applying the methods to the fine mapping of the CASP8 region of chromosome 2 using genotype data from the Collaborative Oncological Gene-Environment Study (COGS) Consortium. The data we analysed included approximately 46,000 breast cancer case and 43,000 healthy control samples.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGenomicsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCaspase 2Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2FemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenome, HumanGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilityCaspase 2Bayes factorsempirical Bayesfine mappingfunctional informationgenetic association

Identifiers

PMID26833494
PMCPMC4832271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.