Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833422›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2017

ATRX in Diffuse Gliomas With its Mosaic/Heterogeneous Expression in a Subset.

Suvendu Purkait, Christopher A Miller, Anupam Kumar, Vikas Sharma, Pankaj Pathak, Prerana Jha, Mehar Chand Sharma, Vaishali Suri, Ashish Suri, B S Sharma and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diffuse astrocytoma with mosaicIntractable & rare diseases research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of ATRX in Glioma Biology.Frontiers in oncology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suvendu PurkaitDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Christopher A MillerMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Anupam KumarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Vikas SharmaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Pankaj PathakDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Prerana JhaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Mehar Chand SharmaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Vaishali SuriDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Ashish SuriDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
B S SharmaDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Robert S FultonMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Shashank Sharad KaleDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Sonika DahiyaDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INJames S. McDonnell Foundation · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims (1) to evaluate ATRX expression in different grades and subtypes of gliomas and correlate with other hallmark genetic alterations, (2) to identify and characterize mosaic/heterogeneous staining in gliomas in terms of mutation status. One hundred seventy six cases of glioma were assessed for ATRX immunohistochemistry and subdivided into positive, negative and mosaic/heterogeneous staining patterns. Five cases with heterogeneous staining were further subjected to next generation sequencing. Higher frequency of ATRX immune-negativity was detected in grade II/III astrocytic, oligoastrocytic tumors and secondary glioblastomas (GBMs), while infrequent in primary GBMs and rare in oligodendrogliomas. Loss of expression was significantly associated with IDH1 and/or TP53 mutation, while mutually exclusive with 1p/19q codeletion. Mosaic/heterogeneous staining was detected exclusively in GBMs (21.2%). Two different types of mosaic staining were identified (1) Admixture of positive and negative nuclei or intermixed mosaic and (2) Separate fragments with positive and negative/intermixed mosaic staining. ATRX mutation was identified in 2/5 (40%) cases with mosaic staining while one case showed DAXX mutation. All these cases were characterized by distinctly separate immune-negative and positive/intermixed foci. Hence, it is suggested that cases with heterogeneous staining (especially those with distinctly negative fragments) should be subjected to mutation analysis.

Indexed as

AdultBrain NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGliomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMutationTumor Suppressor Protein p53X-linked Nuclear ProteinATRX protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53X-linked Nuclear ProteinATRXGliomaheterogeneous stainingmosaic staining

Identifiers

PMID26833422
PMCPMC8029305
OpenAlexW2272319161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.