Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833320›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2016

Personalised computational cardiology: Patient-specific modelling in cardiac mechanics and biomaterial injection therapies for myocardial infarction.

Kevin L Sack, Neil H Davies, Julius M Guccione, Thomas Franz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A cell-based framework for modeling cardiac mechanics.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Graph-based homogenisation for modelling cardiac fibrosis.Journal of computational physics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of left ventricular function during the full cardiac cycle.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Position Paper Computational Cardiology.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin L SackDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, 7935, Observatory, South Africa.
Neil H DaviesCardiovascular Research Unit, MRC IUCHRU, Chris Barnard Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Observatory, South Africa.
Julius M GuccioneDepartment of Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Thomas FranzDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, 7935, Observatory, South Africa. thomas.franz@uct.ac.za.
University of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
VIRTUAL TOOLS FOR CARDIAC VENTRICULAR REMODELING SURGERYR01HL077921 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO · 2006 to 2015
$3.4M
Minimally Invasive Ventricular Polymeric Injection for Treatment of Heart FailureR01HL118627 · NHLBI · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2013 to 2016
$3.0M
Simulation of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Surgical Ventricular RestorationR01HL086400 · NHLBI · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO · 2009 to 2010
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077921NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL086400NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118627NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive computational modelling in biomedical research offers the potential to integrate diverse data, uncover biological mechanisms that are not easily accessible through experimental methods and expose gaps in knowledge requiring further research. Recent developments in computing and diagnostic technologies have initiated the advancement of computational models in terms of complexity and specificity. Consequently, computational modelling can increasingly be utilised as enabling and complementing modality in the clinic-with medical decisions and interventions being personalised. Myocardial infarction and heart failure are amongst the leading causes of death globally despite optimal modern treatment. The development of novel MI therapies is challenging and may be greatly facilitated through predictive modelling. Here, we review the advances in patient-specific modelling of cardiac mechanics, distinguishing specificity in cardiac geometry, myofibre architecture and mechanical tissue properties. Thereafter, the focus narrows to the mechanics of the infarcted heart and treatment of myocardial infarction with particular attention on intramyocardial biomaterial delivery.

Indexed as

Patient-Specific ModelingAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsComputer SimulationDrug Delivery SystemsHumansInjectionsMyocardial InfarctionRatsBiocompatible MaterialsCardiac diseaseComputational modelFinite-element methodHeart failureIschaemic heart diseaseSubject specific

Identifiers

PMID26833320
PMCPMC4969231
OpenAlexW2268777004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.