Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833314›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2016

Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Gabriele Wulf, Rebecca Lewthwaite

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 382 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
382citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06702319 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

İzmir Democracy University, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorIzmir Democracy UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled69ConditionsShoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff TendinitisArmsExercise
NCT07028515 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Self-controlled Practice on Motor Learning and Motivation in People With Parkinson's Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled72ConditionsParkinson Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

382 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Acute and post-acute neurobehavioral responses to lysergic acid diethylamide in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

322 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriele WulfDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, 89154-3034, USA. gabriele.wulf@unlv.edu.
Rebecca LewthwaiteRancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective motor performance is important for surviving and thriving, and skilled movement is critical in many activities. Much theorizing over the past few decades has focused on how certain practice conditions affect the processing of task-related information to affect learning. Yet, existing theoretical perspectives do not accommodate significant recent lines of evidence demonstrating motivational and attentional effects on performance and learning. These include research on (a) conditions that enhance expectancies for future performance, (b) variables that influence learners' autonomy, and (c) an external focus of attention on the intended movement effect. We propose the OPTIMAL (Optimizing Performance through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning) theory of motor learning. We suggest that motivational and attentional factors contribute to performance and learning by strengthening the coupling of goals to actions. We provide explanations for the performance and learning advantages of these variables on psychological and neuroscientific grounds. We describe a plausible mechanism for expectancy effects rooted in responses of dopamine to the anticipation of positive experience and temporally associated with skill practice. Learner autonomy acts perhaps largely through an enhanced expectancy pathway. Furthermore, we consider the influence of an external focus for the establishment of efficient functional connections across brain networks that subserve skilled movement. We speculate that enhanced expectancies and an external focus propel performers' cognitive and motor systems in productive "forward" directions and prevent "backsliding" into self- and non-task focused states. Expected success presumably breeds further success and helps consolidate memories. We discuss practical implications and future research directions.

Indexed as

AttentionHumansLearningMotivationMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceAttentional focusDopamineMotivationMotor performancePositive affectSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.