Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833241›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Using national movement databases to help inform responses to swine disease outbreaks in Scotland: the impact of uncertainty around incursion time.

Thibaud Porphyre, Lisa A Boden, Carla Correia-Gomes, Harriet K Auty, George J Gunn, Mark E J Woolhouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An index for multidimensional assessment of swine health.Tropical animal health and production · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thibaud PorphyreCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, UK.
Lisa A BodenSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Carla Correia-GomesEpidemiology Research Unit, SRUC, Drummondhill, Stratherrick Road, Inverness, UK.
Harriet K AutyEpidemiology Research Unit, SRUC, Drummondhill, Stratherrick Road, Inverness, UK.
George J GunnEpidemiology Research Unit, SRUC, Drummondhill, Stratherrick Road, Inverness, UK.
Mark E J WoolhouseCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modelling is an important component of contingency planning and control of disease outbreaks. Dynamic network models are considered more useful than static models because they capture important dynamic patterns of farm behaviour as evidenced through animal movements. This study evaluates the usefulness of a dynamic network model of swine fever to predict pre-detection spread via movements of pigs, when there may be considerable uncertainty surrounding the time of incursion of infection. It explores the utility and limitations of animal movement data to inform such models and as such, provides some insight into the impact of improving traceability through real-time animal movement reporting and the use of electronic animal movement databases. The study concludes that the type of premises and uncertainty of the time of disease incursion will affect model accuracy and highlights the need for improvements in these areas.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDisease OutbreaksModels, TheoreticalPublic Health SurveillanceAnimalsScotlandSwineSwine DiseasesUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID26833241
PMCPMC4735280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.