Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833235›Full record

Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016

Managing the open abdomen: negative pressure closure versus mesh-mediated fascial traction closure: a randomized trial.

J Camilo Correa, D Alejandro Mejía, N Duque, M Montoya J, C Morales Uribe

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Camilo CorreaUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. jcccote@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-4007
D Alejandro MejíaUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
N DuqueHospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Colombia.
M Montoya JUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
C Morales UribeUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Universidad de Antioquia · COHospital Universitario de San Vicente Fundación · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the effectiveness of abdominal wall closure using the vacuum-assisted closure (NPC) as described by Barker et al. with an institutional protocol using a double polyvinyl bag in the first surgery, which is changed in subsequent surgeries to a polyvinyl bag placed over the bowel loops and a prolene mesh attached to the abdominal fascia (MMFC).

methodsRandomized controlled trial. Patients with open abdomen (OA) due to a traumatic or a medical cause were included in the study. Variables studied included demographics, indication for surgery, number of interventions, hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay, abdominal wound care costs, complication rates, and method and time to definitive fascial closure.

resultsFrom June 2011 to April 2013, 75 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients who died within 48 h were excluded; therefore, 53 patients in total were assessed. NPC achieved fascial closure in 75% of patients, and MMFC achieved closure in 71.9% of patients. The closure rates in patients with OA secondary to medical causes (80% by NPC vs. 71.4% by MMFC) or traumatic causes (70% by NPC vs. 73.7% by MMFC) were similar in both treatment groups. There were no differences between the groups with respect to cause of OA, complications, length of hospital stay, or the length of stay in the intensive care unit.

conclusionMMFC is a method comparable to NPC for the temporary management of OA that results in similar closure and complication rates.

Indexed as

Abdominal Wound Closure TechniquesFasciotomyNegative-Pressure Wound TherapySurgical MeshAbdominal WallAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolypropylenesProsthesis ImplantationBiocompatible MaterialsPolypropylenesMeshNegative pressure wound therapyOpen abdomenTemporary abdominal closure

Identifiers

PMID26833235
OpenAlexW2273226227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.