Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26833118›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2016

New Technologies for Elucidating Opioid Receptor Function.

Michael R Bruchas, Bryan L Roth

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Kappa opioid receptor control of motivated behavior revisited.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Opioid signaling and design of analgesics.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Experience-Regulated Neuronal Signaling in Maternal Behavior.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R BruchasDepartments of Anesthesiology and Neuroscience, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: bruchasm@wustl.edu.
Bryan L RothDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: bryan_roth@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Structure-Function of Opioid ReceptorsP01DA035764 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEREZOV, VADIM, ROTH, BRYAN L. · 2014 to 2018
$7.1M
Diterpines as Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor AgonistsR01DA017204 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROTH, BRYAN L. · 2003 to 2014
$3.2M
DREADD2.0: AN ENHANCED CHEMOGENETIC TOOLKITU01MH105892 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JIN, JIAN, KASH, THOMAS L. · 2014 to 2016
$3.0M
DISSECTING DYNORPHIN-KAPPA OPIOID MEDIATED REINSTATEMENT OF NICOTINE PREFERENCER01DA033396 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRUCHAS, MICHAEL R. · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA035764NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017204NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033396NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH105892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in technology, including high resolution crystal structures of opioid receptors, novel chemical tools, and new genetic approaches have provided an unparalleled palette of tools for deconstructing opioid receptor actions in vitro and in vivo. Here we provide a brief description of our understanding of opioid receptor function from both molecular and atomic perspectives, as well as their role in neural circuits in vivo. We then show how insights into the molecular details of opioid actions can facilitate the creation of functionally selective (biased) and photoswitchable opioid ligands. Finally, we describe how newly engineered opioid receptor-based chemogenetic and optogenetic tools, and new mouse lines, are expanding and transforming our understanding of opioid function and, perhaps, paving the way for new therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMolecular Docking SimulationNerve NetReceptors, OpioidReceptors, Opioidbiased signalingchemogeneticsDREADDsfunctional selectivitymouse modelsoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID26833118
PMCPMC4811714
OpenAlexW2265338893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.