Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26832991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

The Effect of Oxytocin on Third-Party Altruistic Decisions in Unfair Situations: An fMRI Study.

Yang Hu, Dirk Scheele, Benjamin Becker, Georg Voos, Bastian David, René Hurlemann, Bernd Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Neurobiological Mechanisms of Responding to Injustice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The Causal Role of Temporoparietal Junction in Mediating Self-Other Mergence during Mentalizing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Eye for an Eye: Neural Correlates of the Preference for Punishment-Based Justice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang HuCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Dirk ScheeleDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, 53105, Germany.
Benjamin BeckerDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, 53105, Germany.
Georg VoosCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Bastian DavidCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, 53127, Germany.
René HurlemannDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, 53105, Germany.
Bernd WeberCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, 53127, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans display an intriguing propensity to help the victim of social norm violations or punish the violators which require theory-of-mind (ToM)/mentalizing abilities. The hypothalamic peptide oxytocin (OXT) has been implicated in modulating various pro-social behaviors/perception including trust, cooperation, and empathy. However, it is still elusive whether OXT also influences neural responses during third-party altruistic decisions, especially in ToM-related brain regions such as the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). To address this question, we conducted a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment with healthy male participants in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. After the intranasal administration synthetic OXT (OXT(IN)) or placebo (PLC), participants could transfer money from their own endowment to either punish a norm violator or help the victim. In some trials, participants observed the decisions made by a computer. Behaviorally, participants under OXT(IN) showed a trend to accelerate altruistic decisions. At the neural level, we observed a strong three-way interaction between drug treatment (OXT/PLC), agency (self/computer), and decision (help/punish), such that OXT(IN) selectively enhanced activity in the left TPJ during observations of others being helped by the computer. Collectively, our findings indicate that OXT enhances prosocial-relevant perception by increasing ToM-related neural activations.

Indexed as

AltruismSocial PerceptionAdultAffectAnxietyBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxytocinYoung AdultOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID26832991
PMCPMC4735743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.