Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26832656›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2016

High-Resolution Manometry Improves the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia: A Randomized Multicenter Study.

Sabine Roman, Laure Huot, Frank Zerbib, Stanislas Bruley des Varannes, Guillaume Gourcerol, Benoit Coffin, Alain Ropert, Adeline Roux, François Mion

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01284894 (Diagnostic Yield of Esophageal High Resolution Manometry in Patients With Unexplained Dysphagia), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01284894 nacompletednot on this map

Diagnostic Yield of Esophageal High Resolution Manometry in Patients With Unexplained Dysphagia

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2011 to 2013Enrolled247ConditionsDysphagiaArmsConventional manometry, High resolution manometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Guideline
  6. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Article
  10. Utilization trends for esophageal motility testing in the United States.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Optimizing achalasia diagnosis in the era of high-resolution manometry: A Pakistani perspective.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine RomanHospices Civils de Lyon, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Explorations Fonctionnelles Digestives and Lyon I University, Lyon, France.
Laure HuotHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Unité de recherche clinique, and Université de Lyon, EAM 4128 Santé Individu Société, Lyon, France.
Frank ZerbibCHU Bordeaux, Gastroentérologie and Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
Stanislas Bruley des VarannesCHU Nantes, Gastroentérologie, and Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Guillaume GourcerolCHU Rouen, Physiologie Digestive and Rouen University, Rouen, France.
Benoit CoffinAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Gastroentérologie, and Paris Diderot University, Colombes, France.
Alain RopertCHU Rennes, Explorations Fonctionnelles Digestives, Rennes, France.
Adeline RouxHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Unité de recherche clinique, and Université de Lyon, EAM 4128 Santé Individu Société, Lyon, France.
François MionHospices Civils de Lyon, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Explorations Fonctionnelles Digestives and Lyon I University, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRHôpital Louis-Mourier · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHigh-resolution manometry (HRM) might be superior to conventional manometry (CM) to diagnose esophageal motility disorders. We aimed to compare the diagnosis performed with HRM and CM and confirmed at 6 months in a multicenter randomized trial.

methodsPatients with unexplained dysphagia were randomized to undergo either CM or HRM. Motility disorders were diagnosed using the Castell and Spechler classification for CM and the Chicago classification for HRM. Diagnosis confirmation was based on clinical outcome and response to treatment after 6-month follow-up. The initial diagnosis and percentage of confirmed diagnoses were compared between the two arms (CM and HRM).

resultsIn total, 247 patients were randomized and 245 analyzed: 122 in the CM arm and 123 in the HRM arm. A manometric diagnosis was more frequently initially achieved with HRM than with CM (97% vs. 84%; P<0.01). Achalasia was more frequent in the HRM arm (26% vs. 12% in the CM arm; P<0.01) while normal examinations were more frequent in the CM arm (52% vs. 28% in the HRM arm; P<0.05). After follow-up, the initial diagnosis was confirmed in 89% of patients in the HRM arm vs. 81% in the CM arm (P=0.07). Finally, overall procedure tolerance was better with CM than with HRM (P<0.01).

conclusionsThis randomized trial demonstrated an improved diagnostic yield for achalasia with HRM compared with CM. Diagnoses tended to be more frequently confirmed in patients who underwent HRM, suggesting that esophageal motility disorders could be identified earlier with HRM than with CM (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01284894).

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersEsophageal AchalasiaManometryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComparative Effectiveness ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26832656
OpenAlexW2255060555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.