Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26832455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

An integrated multi-electrode-optrode array for in vitro optogenetics.

Marleen Welkenhuysen, Luis Hoffman, Zhengxiang Luo, Anabel De Proft, Chris Van den Haute, Veerle Baekelandt, Zeger Debyser, Georges Gielen, Robert Puers, Dries Braeken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Optogenetic Brain-Computer Interfaces.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Biohybrid Photonic Platform for Subcellular Stimulation and Readout of In Vitro Neurons.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Sub-millisecond Control of Neuronal Firing by Organic Light-Emitting Diodes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marleen WelkenhuysenImec, Life Science Technologies Department, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, 3001, Belgium.
Luis HoffmanImec, Life Science Technologies Department, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, 3001, Belgium.
Zhengxiang LuoImec, Life Science Technologies Department, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, 3001, Belgium.
Anabel De ProftImec, Life Science Technologies Department, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, 3001, Belgium.
Chris Van den HauteKULeuven, Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok i - box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Veerle BaekelandtKULeuven, Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok i - box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Zeger DebyserKULeuven, Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok i - box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Flanders, Belgium.
Georges GielenKULeuven, Engineering Department, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - bus 2443, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Robert PuersKULeuven, Engineering Department, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - bus 2443, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Dries BraekenImec, Life Science Technologies Department, Kapeldreef 75, Heverlee, 3001, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of a group of cells or tissue needs to be very precise in order to exercise effective control over the cell population under investigation. Optogenetic tools have already demonstrated to be of great value in the study of neuronal circuits and in neuromodulation. Ideally, they should permit very accurate resolution, preferably down to the single cell level. Further, to address a spatially distributed sample, independently addressable multiple optical outputs should be present. In current techniques, at least one of these requirements is not fulfilled. In addition to this, it is interesting to directly monitor feedback of the modulation by electrical registration of the activity of the stimulated cells. Here, we present the fabrication and characterization of a fully integrated silicon-based multi-electrode-optrode array (MEOA) for in vitro optogenetics. We demonstrate that this device allows for artifact-free electrical recording. Moreover, the MEOA was used to reliably elicit spiking activity from ChR2-transduced neurons. Thanks to the single cell resolution stimulation capability, we could determine spatial and temporal activation patterns and spike latencies of the neuronal network. This integrated approach to multi-site combined optical stimulation and electrical recording significantly advances today's tool set for neuroscientists in their search to unravel neuronal network dynamics.

Indexed as

MicroelectrodesAction PotentialsAnimalsEquipment DesignLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicroscopy, ConfocalNeuronsOptogeneticsPyramidal CellsRats

Identifiers

PMID26832455
PMCPMC4735812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.