Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26832432›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Secular trends in smoking during pregnancy according to income and ethnic group: four population-based perinatal surveys in a Brazilian city.

Mariangela F Silveira, Alicia Matijasevich, Ana Maria B Menezes, Bernardo L Horta, Ina S Santos, Aluisio J D Barros, Fernando C Barros, Cesar G Victora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rural-Urban Disparities in Perinatal Smoking in the United States: Trends and Determinants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Trend and disparities for smoking during pregnancy in the extreme south of Brazil between 2007 and 2019.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariangela F SilveiraFaculty of Medicine, Maternal and Child Department and Post Graduation Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Alicia MatijasevichDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil Faculty of Medicine, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Ana Maria B MenezesFaculty of Medicine, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Bernardo L HortaFaculty of Medicine, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Ina S SantosFaculty of Medicine, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Aluisio J D BarrosFaculty of Medicine, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Fernando C BarrosPost-Graduate Program in Health and Behavior, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraFaculty of Medicine, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in smoking during pregnancy over three decades (1982-2011).

settingPopulation-based study in Pelotas City, Brazil.

participantsAll urban women giving birth in the city hospitals in 1982 (5909), 1993 (5223) and 2004 (4201), plus all urban and rural women delivering from January 2011 to April 2012 (6275). PRIMARY OUTCOME: Self-reported smoking during pregnancy.

resultsThe prevalence of smoking during pregnancy fell from 35.7% in 1982 to 21.0% in 2011. In each survey, prevalence decreased with increasing income (p<0.001). In the poorest quintile, smoking fell by 27.4% in the period studied compared to 67.1% in the wealthiest quintile. In all surveys, prevalence was lower among white women than among those who classified themselves as black or brown (p<0.001). Over time, smoking declined by 50.0% among the former and 30.7% among the latter. Absolute and relative inequalities both increased over time.

conclusionsThe reduction in smoking during pregnancy was primarily due to a decline among white, high-income women. Further efforts are needed to reduce smoking among all population groups.

Indexed as

AdultBlack PeopleBrazilEthnicityFemaleHumansIncomePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalenceSmokingWhite PeopleYoung Adultinequalitiespregancysmokingtrends

Identifiers

PMID26832432
PMCPMC4746479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.