Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26832363›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2016

Patient experience in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: state of the science.

N Nussbaum, D J George, A P Abernethy, C M Dolan, N Oestreicher, S Flanders, T B Dorff

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacokinetics and dosimetry of [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. OptimizingFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Understanding symptomatic experience, impact, and emotional response in recently diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

N NussbaumDepartment of Genitourinary Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
D J GeorgeDepartment of Genitourinary Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
A P AbernethyFlatiron Health, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
C M DolanCMD Consulting, Inc., Sandy, UT, USA.
N OestreicherDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
S FlandersHealth Economics and Clinical Outcomes Research, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA.
T B DorffUSC Norris Cancer Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USCenter for Global Development · USFlatiron Health (United States) · USUniversity of California System · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContemporary therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have shown survival improvements, which do not account for patient experience and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

methodsThis literature review included a search of MEDLINE for randomized clinical trials enrolling ⩾50 patients with mCRPC and reporting on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) since 2010.

resultsNineteen of 25 publications describing seven treatment regimens (10 clinical trials and nine associated secondary analyses) met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised. The most commonly used measures were the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (n=5 trials) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (n=4 trials) questionnaires. The published data indicated that HRQoL and pain status augmented the clinical efficacy data by providing a better understanding of treatment impact in mCRPC. Abiraterone acetate and prednisone, enzalutamide, radium-223 dichloride and sipuleucel-T offered varying levels of HRQoL benefit and/or pain mitigation versus their respective comparators, whereas three treatments (mitoxantrone, estramustine phosphate and docetaxel, and cabazitaxel) had no meaningful impact on HRQoL or pain. The main limitation of the data were that the PROs utilized were not developed for use in mCRPC patients and hence may not have comprehensively captured symptoms important to this population.

conclusionsRecently published randomized clinical trials of new agents for mCRPC have captured elements of the patient experience while on treatment. Further research is required to standardize methods for measuring, quantifying and reporting on HRQoL and pain in patients with mCRPC in the clinical practice setting.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunotherapyMaleNeoplasm MetastasisProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26832363
PMCPMC4868871
OpenAlexW2345296224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.