Reinterpreting Respect for Relationally and Biologically Informed Autonomy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. How choice became a goal in itself: analysing the emphasis on choice and control at the end of life through the work of Charles Taylor.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026
   Article
2. Balancing perspectives: a critical reflection on autonomy, respect and communication in end-of-life choice-making processes.BMC medical ethics · 2026
   Article
3. What deserves our respect? Reexamination of respect for autonomy in the context of the management of chronic conditions.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine.2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as