ArticleOptics express2015
Embedded pupil function recovery for Fourier ptychographic microscopy: erratum.
Article in Optics express, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic aperture interference light (SAIL) microscopy for high-throughput label-free imaging.Applied physics letters · 2021Article
- Long-Distance Sub-Diffraction High-Resolution Imaging Using Sparse Sampling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the original paper, the line width of the resolution target (which corresponds to half-pitch resolution) was used to characterize the resolution of our microscope system. However, we think that full-pitch resolution offers a better definition of the imaging system's resolution limit. In this erratum, we list specific sections from the manuscript that used half-pitch resolution and correct them accordingly.
Identifiers
26831971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.