ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2016
Microbial yield from physiotherapy assisted sputum production in respiratory outpatients.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sputum signatures for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with underlying respiratory diseases (SPARED): study protocol for a prospective diagnostic trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Trial
- Diagnostic criteria for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in COPD patients.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in pathogen detection ofInfectious medicine · 2025Review
- Case Definition of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Resource-Constrained Settings.Emerging infectious diseases · 2018Article
- The Management of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis: The UK National Aspergillosis Centre Approach.Current fungal infection reports · 2017Review
- Clinical implications of globally emerging azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Review
- Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis-Where Are We? and Where Are We Going?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSputum is a key diagnostic sample for those with chronic chest conditions including chronic and allergic aspergillus-related disease, but often not obtained in clinic. The objective of this study was to evaluate physiotherapeutic interventions to obtain sputum from those not able to spontaneously produce and the subsequent microbiological result.
methodsSputum samples were collected by physiotherapists from patients attending routine outpatient clinics managing their aspergillus-related diseases who were unable to spontaneously produce. Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) technique was applied first, for 10 min, followed by hypertonic saline induction using a Pari LC plus or Pari Sprint nebuliser, if necessary and deemed safe to do so. Samples processed in the laboratory using standard microbiological techniques for bacterial and fungal culture with the addition of Aspergillus real-time PCR.
resultsSamples were procured from 353 of 364 (97%) patients, 231 (65%) by ACBT and 119 (34%) with administration of hypertonic saline. Three of 125 (2.4%) patients had significant bronchospasm during sputum induction. Sixteen patients' sputum tested positive for Aspergillus culture, contrasting with 82 whose Aspergillus PCR was positive, 59 with a strong signal. PCR improved detection of Aspergillus by 350%. Sputum from 124 (34%) patients cultured other potentially pathogenic organisms which justified specific therapy.
conclusionsPhysiotherapeutic interventions safely and effectively procured sputum from patients unable to spontaneously produce. The method for sputum induction was well-tolerated and time-efficient, with important microbiological results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.