Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26831814›Full record

ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2016

Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect.

Martin H Teicher, Jacqueline A Samson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 552 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
552citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

552 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

492 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin H TeicherDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacqueline A SamsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Early Stress, Sensitive Periods and the Neurobiology of AddictionR01DA017846 · NIDA · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI TEICHER, MARTIN H · 2004 to 2024
$9.8M
Neurobiology of Mothering and Infant StressR01HD079484 · NICHD · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BOSQUET ENLOW, MICHELLE A, GRANT, PATRICIA ELLEN · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Sensitive Periods, Brain Development and DepressionR01MH091391 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI TEICHER, MARTIN H · 2010 to 2014
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079484NIDA NIH HHS 5R01 DA017846NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017846NIMH NIH HHS 5R01 MH091391NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood maltreatment is the most important preventable cause of psychopathology accounting for about 45% of the population attributable risk for childhood onset psychiatric disorders. A key breakthrough has been the discovery that maltreatment alters trajectories of brain development.

methodsThis review aims to synthesize neuroimaging findings in children who experienced caregiver neglect as well as from studies in children, adolescents and adults who experienced physical, sexual and emotional abuse. In doing so, we provide preliminary answers to questions regarding the importance of type and timing of exposure, gender differences, reversibility and the relationship between brain changes and psychopathology. We also discuss whether these changes represent adaptive modifications or stress-induced damage.

resultsParental verbal abuse, witnessing domestic violence and sexual abuse appear to specifically target brain regions (auditory, visual and somatosensory cortex) and pathways that process and convey the aversive experience. Maltreatment is associated with reliable morphological alterations in anterior cingulate, dorsal lateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex, corpus callosum and adult hippocampus, and with enhanced amygdala response to emotional faces and diminished striatal response to anticipated rewards. Evidence is emerging that these regions and interconnecting pathways have sensitive exposure periods when they are most vulnerable.

conclusionsEarly deprivation and later abuse may have opposite effects on amygdala volume. Structural and functional abnormalities initially attributed to psychiatric illness may be a more direct consequence of abuse. Childhood maltreatment exerts a prepotent influence on brain development and has been an unrecognized confound in almost all psychiatric neuroimaging studies. These brain changes may be best understood as adaptive responses to facilitate survival and reproduction in the face of adversity. Their relationship to psychopathology is complex as they are discernible in both susceptible and resilient individuals with maltreatment histories. Mechanisms fostering resilience will need to be a primary focus of future studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainChildChild AbuseChild Abuse, SexualChild DevelopmentHumansNeuroimagingChild abuseneglectneuroimagingresiliencestress

Identifiers

PMID26831814
PMCPMC4760853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.