Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26831545›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Network-based in silico drug efficacy screening.

Emre Guney, Jörg Menche, Marc Vidal, Albert-László Barábasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 318 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
318citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
53.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

318 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 594 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

258 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emre GuneyCenter for Complex Networks Research (CCNR) and Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 177 Huntington Avenue, 11th floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3466-6535
Jörg MencheCenter for Complex Networks Research (CCNR) and Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 177 Huntington Avenue, 11th floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Marc VidalCenter for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB) and Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Albert-László BarábasiCenter for Complex Networks Research (CCNR) and Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 177 Huntington Avenue, 11th floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Northeastern University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Genomic Analysis of Network Perturbations in Human DiseaseP50HG004233 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI VIDAL, MARC · 2007 to 2017
$31.6M
The Phathophenotype Landscape of Complex DiseaseU01HL108630 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LOSCALZO, JOSEPH · 2011 to 2014
$2.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS 50-HG004233NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004233NHLBI NIH HHS 1U01HL108630-01NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL108630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing cost of drug development together with a significant drop in the number of new drug approvals raises the need for innovative approaches for target identification and efficacy prediction. Here, we take advantage of our increasing understanding of the network-based origins of diseases to introduce a drug-disease proximity measure that quantifies the interplay between drugs targets and diseases. By correcting for the known biases of the interactome, proximity helps us uncover the therapeutic effect of drugs, as well as to distinguish palliative from effective treatments. Our analysis of 238 drugs used in 78 diseases indicates that the therapeutic effect of drugs is localized in a small network neighborhood of the disease genes and highlights efficacy issues for drugs used in Parkinson and several inflammatory disorders. Finally, network-based proximity allows us to predict novel drug-disease associations that offer unprecedented opportunities for drug repurposing and the detection of adverse effects.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerDrug DiscoveryMolecular StructureStructure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID26831545
PMCPMC4740350
OpenAlexW2263739890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.