Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26831486›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2016

Fear as a Barrier to Asymptomatic Colonoscopy Screening in an Urban Minority Population with Health Insurance.

Corey H Basch, Charles E Basch, Patricia Zybert, Randi L Wolf

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02392143 (Promoting CRC Screening in a Hard-To-Reach, Low-Income Minority Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02392143 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting CRC Screening in a Hard-To-Reach, Low-Income Minority Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeachers College, Columbia UniversityRan2009 to 2014Enrolled564ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsPrinted Education Material, Academic Detailing, Academic Detailing+Telephone Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers by Two Methods.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Quantification of EctopicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient Experiences with Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corey H BaschDepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University, 366 University Hall, Wayne, NJ, 07470, USA. baschc@wpunj.edu.
Charles E BaschDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
Patricia ZybertDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
Randi L WolfDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study identified barriers to colonoscopy in a high-risk population and examined associations between barriers and both intention to comply with physician recommendation to receive colonoscopy and documented receipt of colonoscopy. Participants, enrollees in a randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of educational interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening, were all 50+ years old and out of compliance with recommended screening guidelines. Direct financial cost of the procedure was not a barrier. The most commonly cited barriers were being afraid of the colonoscopy procedure (43.1 %), embarrassment (42.3 %), having to take a powerful laxative (36.2 %), fear of cancer (31.2 %), and fear of sedation (30.3 %). There were dose-response relationships between barriers and both intention to comply with physician recommendation of colonoscopy: 0, 1, 2, 3 barriers, 88.9, 79.0, 69.2 and 60.0 % intending to comply, respectively (linear trend χ(2) = 27.9, p = .000) and documented receipt of a colonoscopy: 0, 1, 2, 3 barriers, 21.7, 21.6, 8.5, 12.0 %, respectively (linear trend χ(2) = 8.4, p = .004). Only 6.9 % of the 102 expressing both fear of procedure and concern about taking a powerful laxative had a colonoscopy. These findings highlight the need to address patients' fear and suggest the importance of offering alternative colorectal cancer screening tests. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02392143.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFearFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsUrban PopulationBarriersColorectal cancer screeningMinority

Identifiers

PMID26831486
OpenAlexW2256139987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.