Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26831402›Full record

ArticleAnnals of human genetics2016

On Sample Size and Power Calculation for Variant Set-Based Association Tests.

Baolin Wu, James S Pankow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baolin WuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
James S PankowDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1)UL1RR025005 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$75.8M
Building on GWAS for NHLBI-disease: the CHARGE consortiumRC2HL102419 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BOERWINKLE, ERIC A. · 2009 to 2010
$27.6M
Genome-Wide Association Analysis in Essential Hypertension (FEHGAS study)R01HL086694 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ARAVINDA CHAKRAVARTI · 2007 to 2026
$21.2M
Epidemiology of Venous Thrombosis & Pulmonary EmbolismR01HL059367 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI TANG, WEIHONG · 1998 to 2024
$11.8M
Genome-Wide Association for Loci Influencing CHD and Other Heart, Lung and BloodR01HL087641 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BOERWINKLE, ERIC A. · 2006 to 2008
$3.7M
GWA for Gene-Environment Interaction Effects Influencing CHDU01HG004402 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BOERWINKLE, ERIC A. · 2007 to 2009
$1.6M
Statistical Model Building for High Dimensional Biomedical DataR01GM083345 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WU, BAOLIN · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
Statistical methods for large-scale significance and prediction analysis with appR01CA134848 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WU, BAOLIN · 2009 to 2010
$291k
NCI NIH HHS CA134848NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134848NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025005NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004402NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100005CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100005GNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100005INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100006CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100007CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100007INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100008CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100008INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100009CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100009INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100010CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100011CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100011INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100012CNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL059367NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL086694NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL087641NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102419NIGMS NIH HHS GM083345NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sample size and power calculations are an important part of designing new sequence-based association studies. The recently developed SEQPower and SPS programs adopted computationally intensive Monte Carlo simulations to empirically estimate power for a series of variant set association (VSA) test methods including the sequence kernel association test (SKAT). It is desirable to develop methods that can quickly and accurately compute power without intensive Monte Carlo simulations. We will show that the computed power for SKAT based on the existing analytical approach could be inflated especially for small significance levels, which are often of primary interest for large-scale whole genome and exome sequencing projects. We propose a new χ(2) -approximation-based approach to accurately and efficiently compute sample size and power. In addition, we propose and implement a more accurate "exact" method to compute power, which is more efficient than the Monte Carlo approach though generally involves more computations than the χ(2) approximation method. The exact approach could produce very accurate results and be used to verify alternative approximation approaches. We implement the proposed methods in publicly available R programs that can be readily adapted when planning sequencing projects.

Indexed as

ExomeSample SizeChi-Square DistributionComputer SimulationGenetic Association StudiesHumansMonte Carlo MethodSample sizesequence kernel association testsequencing study

Identifiers

PMID26831402
PMCPMC4761288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.