ArticleAnnals of human genetics2016
On Sample Size and Power Calculation for Variant Set-Based Association Tests.
Article in Annals of human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A polygenic predictor of treatment-resistant depression using whole exome sequencing and genome-wide genotyping.Translational psychiatry · 2020Article
- A review of kernel methods for genetic association studies.Genetic epidemiology · 2019Review
- Power and sample size calculations for high-throughput sequencing-based experiments.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Power Analysis for Genetic Association Test (PAGEANT) provides insights to challenges for rare variant association studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Methods for meta-analysis of multiple traits using GWAS summary statistics.Genetic epidemiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sample size and power calculations are an important part of designing new sequence-based association studies. The recently developed SEQPower and SPS programs adopted computationally intensive Monte Carlo simulations to empirically estimate power for a series of variant set association (VSA) test methods including the sequence kernel association test (SKAT). It is desirable to develop methods that can quickly and accurately compute power without intensive Monte Carlo simulations. We will show that the computed power for SKAT based on the existing analytical approach could be inflated especially for small significance levels, which are often of primary interest for large-scale whole genome and exome sequencing projects. We propose a new χ(2) -approximation-based approach to accurately and efficiently compute sample size and power. In addition, we propose and implement a more accurate "exact" method to compute power, which is more efficient than the Monte Carlo approach though generally involves more computations than the χ(2) approximation method. The exact approach could produce very accurate results and be used to verify alternative approximation approaches. We implement the proposed methods in publicly available R programs that can be readily adapted when planning sequencing projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.